|
2008 Beijing Olympic Games
Hand grenades and OlympicsPosted by Jeremy Goldkorn, August 15, 2008 6:15 PM
Hand grenade throwing days—Zhang Lijia (left) at 13 with siblings On August 3, Zhang Lijia, author of the recent book "Socialism is Great!": A Worker's Memoir of the New China (see excerpt) published an opinion piece in The Guardian about the Beijing Olympics and the way the world sees China. The title, 'Time to stop criticising China—we've already come so far' evidently appealed to the sensibilities of an editor at the state-owned rag The China Daily, who republished the piece a week later without asking for permission as 'Come, see how far we've come'. In a sad demonstration of China Daily oversensitivity, they bowdlerized the article slightly to remove certain phrases. For example this passage:
The China Daily reworked it as:
Lame, unnecessary, and less helpful to the Chinese government's own cause than the original version. Anyhow, below is the original article (slightly different from The Guardian version), republished with permission of the author. Hand grenades and Olympicsby Zhang LijiaAt my school, sports lessons included an exercise where we threw hand grenades (made from wood topped with metal to resemble the real thing) against a wall that stretched a red slogan with the reason for our militaristic ‘sport’ – ‘exercise our bodies and protect our motherland’. We feared that China might be invaded one day by the American imperialists or Soviet revisionists. Indeed, the whole west seemed holding evil intent towards us. Living in a closed country, we had little idea about the outside world. I went to school in Nanjing in the early 70’s, when the revolutionary fever of the Cultural Revolution was calming down. A few years earlier, my father was banished to the countryside for criticizing the government. My grandfather, a small-time grain dealer, had committed suicide – as he worried his not-so-politically-correct background would land him in trouble. These were the darkest times for my family as well for my our nation. Somehow the image of those dark days remain deeply imprinted on western mind, even though China has come a long way since then. Maybe the west is a little too keen to report the negative stories? Or perhaps, the west feels more comfortable to hear such stories? That’s my impression, as a Chinese who has lived abroad and now writes for the western media, based in Beijing. I had dreamt of becoming a journalist or a writer since hand grenade days. But my dream was shattered at the age of 16 when my mother dragged me from school to work at a state-owned missile factory. Only after I finally made my way to England did I dare to pursue my long buried dream. My journalistic career started with the Olympics. In 1993, on the night when the result of Olympic bidding was announced, I was at Tiananmen Square, reporting for the ABC (Australian) when the fountain went off – it must have been the biggest pre-mature ejaculation in history - as people thought China had won the bid. It was heart-breaking to interview the bitterly disappointed crowds. But China wasn’t really ready. The memory of the bloody crackdown in 1989 was still fresh.
I was just as happy as everyone else. Ever since the economic reforms, China has driven millions of people out of the poverty. An incredible feat in human history. As a child, I used to roast cicadas to eat to satisfy my graving for meat; now my 19-year-old nephew, a law university student in Nanjing, drives his own car. And people are now enjoying a great deal more of personal freedom. As a rocket factory girl, I had to endure so many rules. I worked there for ten years without any promotion partly because of my naturally curly hair: my boss thought I wore a perm. Back then only those with bourgeois outlook would curl their hair. These days, young women curl their hair, shave off their hair or change the colours of their hair whenever they want. In the past years, I have seen with my own eyes how the capital has been transformed. The state-of-art buildings, not just those Olympic buildings such as the ‘Bird Nest’ and the ‘Water Cubes’ – have popped up like mushrooms after a spring rain. Right now, Beijing, having undergone a face-lift, has never looked so beautiful, clean and quiet. Huge effort and sacrifice has been made. Polluting factories around Beijing were shut down; construction work has been halted and cars taken off the road. These may be necessary measures to ensure the air quality. Other measures seem excessive: beggars, the homeless and migrants without documentations were driven out; while petitioners – those who try to bring their grievance to the higher authority - have been stopped from entering the capital. Potential trouble-makers are being monitored or under house arrest. Excessive. That’s always the way the authority adopts while dealing with uncertainly. Beijing’s Olympics will be a big success because the majority of population, proud as Chinese are, want it to be, not just because the government wants to use Olympic success to gain legitimacy. Xia Fengzhi, a 67-year-old retired worker and a volunteer, told me how happy and excited he is about the games. “I want foreigners to see what has China achieved. We were called the ‘sick men of Asia. Now we are strong and rich enough to hold such a major international event,” he said. No doubt, there’ll be plenty of negative stories in the foreign media, criticizing China’s human rights abuses, the lack of media freedom; the treatment of petitioners and the over-tight securities. Some Chinese have no access to the reports; other do but decide to diminish them as grumbles from the anti-China forces. In a survey conducted by Pew Research Centre, China ranks the first among 24 nations in their optimism about their country’s future, buoyed by the fast economic growth and the promise of Olympics. There’s another factor – the timing, I believe. The survey was conducted this spring, just after Tibet unrest and in the middle of the troubled torch relay when we witnessed a surge of nationalism in response to what many Chinese regarded as the ‘anti-China feeling’ in the west and ‘biased’ Tibet reports. Personally, I have no problem with negative stories. But I also think it is wrong for the west to stand in a self-appointed high-moral ground to accuse China this and that, especially when some of the accusations are not true. To take Tibet unrest as an example, what happened in Lhasa, in my view, was far more complicated than “the Chinese government’s ruthless crackdown of Tibetan protest”. There was a peaceful protest but there was also a violent racial riot which I doubt would be tolerated in any country. As a journalist, most of my stories criticize the government, which seems to have little idea about PR. Blessed with such domestic support and armed with the practiced skills in mass organization, the authority could have afforded to take a more relaxed approach. Why not make Olympic games a real fun party – China’s big coming-out party? No need to cause so much interruption to the people’s lives. It would have been better to let the world to see China as it actual is. And I can’t help but feeling there has been a missed opportunity on more important matters, too. Instead of trying to hide the problem, our leaders could have taken this as a good chance to address the real issues, cracking down on corruption, improving the rule of law, relaxing media control and opening the country further. Don’t doubt our support for Beijing’s games. After all, the Olympics are meant to be the occasion to bring people with different views together. Secondly, it’ll provide a chance for China and the rest of the world to understand each other better. Although I can understand how China’s undemocratic political system and lack of transparency makes west uneasy, especially compounded by the country’s rapid rise, I think much of the fear is generated by ignorance. Today, the school kids enjoy far more sophisticated facilities than hand grenades. They know a lot more about the outside world, so do their parents. I wonder if the western kids and their parents know as much about China as we know about the west? If they did, would there be still the same fear? Maybe this Olympic Games will bring that gap one step closer. |
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
affordabe on
Blogspot unblocked, but Blogger is blocked
Adam J. Sc on
Snow in Beijing
Peter Kauf on
Bound feet in China
lost in tr on
Shanzhai National Day parade
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Xujun Eberlein's Apologies Forthcoming: Hong Kong's Blacksmith Books has published a short story collection by Xujun Eberlein.
Princess Der Ling: Two Years in the Forbidden City: Two years in the Forbidden City is largely a reminiscence of the minutiae of life for one of history's most powerful women, by one of her court attendants, a Manchu noble's daughter by the name of Der Ling.
Carl Crow's The Long Road Back to China: In 1939 Carl Crow - an American journalist, advertising executive and author who had lived in Shanghai for 25 years until forced out by the Japanese - travelled up the Burma Road from Rangoon to Chongqing on assignment for Liberty magazine - 'the most interesting assignment I have ever been given'.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ New Weekly: Do Chinese kids know anything about traditonal Chinese culture? (2004.06): Q: Do you know what China's four great inventions are? Paper, printing, the compass and gunpowder 49.3% know all four, 37.3% get one or more wrong, 13.3% don't know at all (2004.06.12) + The horrors of SMS messaging (2007.09): Naraka 19 (地狱第19层), based on the Cai Jun (蔡骏) novel, gets neutered by SARFT. + China's illegal yellow press (2005.05): On the left is the front page of 'Military News', a newspaper without masthead, contact phone number or any kind of publication licence (required by Chinese law). The paper was purchased on the Beijing subway for two yuan, which is relatively expensive, as most of the city's daily newspapers cost only half a yuan.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |





Comments on Hand grenades and Olympics
It's sad when an insecure, totalitarian bunch of goons revises the work of one of its thoughtful, successful citizens (without even paying for the rights) and twists it so.
Not that most Chinese would even see this article in the first place.
It's a great service that you highlight this piece so that a few of the other thoughtful and level headed citizens that might browse here can be aware. Oh yeah...also ready the battlements for the usual uber patriots as well, to denounce this author!
I can't help but think of how much amazing kudos and goodwill the CCP would have gotten from the universe (in the same manner of their earthquake response) if they had just gotten the balls to outright invite Mr D. Lama to the opening ceremonies?? Think of it...he himself would have been flabbergasted with the ball in his court and would have been forced to be conciliatory and gracious and the goons in Zhongnanhai would have come out smelling like roses...
Take a look at the "translations" of foreign articles on the Global Times websites for daily examples. Absolutely pathetic and disgusting.
Hand grenades throwing was my best event in school competition... in the 90's. It's very similar to shotput, expect you're rate on accuracy rather then distance.
This is a really interesting excerpt to me. It reminds me (I'm American, in Chicago, IL) that in the midst of struggle and the mixed bag that is change, 10 people are going to have 10 different points-of-view. I expected this excerpt to read as more critical of the government, but on the other hand, it makes sense that Zhang Lijia would have some gratitude and pride for her country with how much things have changed.
Also, she points to something that I am trying to be very careful about-- making sure that when talking about censorship, human rights abuses, the environment, etc., I am criticizing the Chinese government and not the Chinese people. There is a huge difference! I do not claim allegiance with my government on nearly any of our foreign policy.
Also I believe that the west is equally guilty of abusing the human rights of people in China because, rather than exposing and trying to do something about it, the US government accepts "hush" money by heavily investing its corporations in China. The US is saying that it's more important to make humongous profits than it is to help ensure that people are treated humanely.
There is lots of research on China and the Olympics on the website of the nonprofit I work for, IssueLab. You can check it out here-- link
Again, thank you for your interesting and informative blog.
To me, as another Chinese living abraod, this is an excellent article - to the point, free of attitude, and a healthy sense of patriotism. I'm left with some sobering questions.
1. In the context of embracing and recognizing changes and developments Chinese government AND Chinese people have achieved so far:
"
Maybe the west is a little too keen to report the negative stories? Or perhaps, the west feels more comfortable to hear such stories?
"
2. In the context that change will most probably take place from within, based on symmetrical information, and takes its own course:
"
I wonder if the western kids and their parents know as much about China as we know about the west? If they did, would there be still the same fear?
"
These all said, few ??? to the Chinese government:
Where has the ancient wisdom gone when it comes to dealing with criticism?
Does China lose more by showing its true colors to the world than trying to show the self-endorsed "perfect" face?
Nowadays no people believe single-sided stories (any more), when Chinese hear hear all the positives from domestic media, they ask how come? When people outside China hear all the negatives, and if they care, they decide not to be subjected to another form of censorship of the truth.
To Hunxuer,
--"one of its thoughtful, successful citizens"?
MS. Zhang Lijia is no Chinese citizen, but British passport holder since more than 10 years.
I love how some people love saying "it is not you, it is your government that we have a problem with". It's got to be the cheesiest line ever. Has it ever occurred to you that if one day China democratizes you might not like it any more than you do today? Has it ever occurred to you that a free and democratic China might be no less threatening than you think it is today?
I chuckle every time when I see people making the China argument a "human rights" and "democracy" one. While I don't doubt that there are people out there who geuinely care about these, but make no mistake: Whether you admit it or not, it has always been about "us" vs. "them" driven by diverging interests. China has been propped up as a bag guy, challenging the west with its non-Judeo-Christian culture, its non-democratic model and above all, its reluctance to succumb itself to a world order which first and foremost seeks to maximize western interests. Us, the good guys vs. them, the bad guys. So naturally China becomes a bad guy and no good things can ever happen to a bad guy, right? Those western journalists who came to China came with the preconception that China is all about human rights violations, oppressed people etc., so it is only natural for them to see what they want to see which will only reinforce their preconceptions that China is a bad guy (unlike us good guys). So they keep spoon-feeding those negative stuff and BS to people back home and presenting as the only face of China, overtime that's what most people are used to reading and it does not make any financial sense (bottomline-wise) for those western media outlets to break from this decades-old tradition.
Typically this is what you hear about China: A dictatorship who has no regards whatsoever for human rights and common decency ruthlessly suppress its people who are vastly unhappy and fed up with the regime and the only thing that keeps them from rising up is the economic growth that this regime has been able to deliver. What? PEW says some 80% of the Chinese are satisified with the direction in which China is heading? Oh God that's wrong! PEW must be infiltrated by the evil Chinese government and their survey sample consisted of people who are members of the Womaodang only!
I think their final game is to encircle Russia and China (this why the "Western" media do what they do, to prepare for the ramp up to the confrontation. It's a pyramid scheme and compartmentalization, so I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Your typical journalist is not evil), to start WWIII, for the new empire of the elite; they want to consolidate their control, forever (hey, it's all control or nothing, so don't say why would they want to do that when they have control already, since they need to work extra hard now to have the same level of control) What they want is to be able to preemptively strike Russia and China, without fear of MAD (when you have people using depleted uranium I can see them not giving a fuck about fallout. Plus the stated goal eliminating most population, so who cares). You say thats bs since the current anti-missile tech is limited, but once they have the system in place, they can 'upgrade' it, under your nose most likely. They may have some ace card you don't know about. Why would anyone be supprised if Russia is 'tripping' on this, it upsets the balance of power.Okay, I'm being a little nutty here, why would anyone would ever want to do that? But the elites are crazy! Occult beliefs and all that (I know that's not proof of anything).
This is not political. It's not abut left or right. It's not about any of the normal 'reasons.' It just plain madness.
What I also find crazy is all the bio-weapon research. Why the hell would we want to mess around with that crap? Oh, to fuck them back whoever fuck you first? It's just a dangerous game. It's scary when Wolfowitz talks about weapons that targets specific genotypes. You don't think that is nutty? What if some scientist just go "fuck the world, biatch, I'm gonna be the last man alive mofos." type deal?
I know people here(the expats, the chinese, the average joe/jane) hates me for what I'm saying, but it just fucks their world view up so much. LOL.
When it's like that nothing is clear man. What the fuck is nationalism, or democracy, or communism, or censorship, or olympics, or pop music, or www.danwei.org, or CNN, or phoenix t.v, or peking duck, or hot pot, hell fucking lamb kabab in such a context???!!!