|
Business and Finance
Stock market trembles at a fake People's Daily editorialPosted by Joel Martinsen on Thursday, April 26, 2007 at 11:27 PM
![]() Turns out it was all just a hoax. Though the government is supposed to have left behind the old practices of planting editorials to implement policy changes, investors have long memories - the fake resembled a real editorial that PD ran in 1996, after which the market tanked. Here's a short comment on the issue by Southern Weekly's Guo Guangdong: People's Daily won't publish a stock market editorial. Good!by Guo Guangdong / SW"People's Daily will issue an important editorial against the stock market!" The stock market experienced dramatic tremors today on the influence of this rumor; market confidence declined sharply from several days before, and a sense of panic and desire to flee was in evidence. These two days, an article titled "People's Daily Editorial" has been circulating online. The "editorial" began: "Since 2005, the stock market has steadily risen, rising sharply from 2006 on. From 2006 to 2007, the Shanghai Composite Index has risen 300%, and the Shenzhen Index has risen 340%....we ought to have a sober understanding of the conditions of the our country's stock market." As stock market averages have been hitting new highs, this type of information strikes like a lightning bolt at the weak hearts of old stockholders. Many people remember the People's Daily editorial of 16 December, 1999* - "A correct understanding of the current stock market" - as if it were yesterday. When this signed commentary "warning of the stock market's risks" was published, the market tumbled over several days and investors were struck dumb with anxiety. In this way, a long bear market started because of an editorial. So when this type of "editorial" reappears today, can investors avoid panicking? Fortunately, the media asked for confirmation from People's Daily: this piece of news was pure rumor; People's Daily had no plan to publish an editorial on the stock market. However, the reason the so-called "People's Daily Editorial" was able to spread so widely and with such real effects is not hard to see: the spectre of the "policy market" looms large in people's minds. The old habit of using a People's Daily editorial to prop up or push down the market should no longer be given space to breathe. In short, let the government have what belongs to the goverment, and let the market have what belongs to the market. Managers are responsible for oversight, investors are responsible for investing; bridges are bridges and roads are roads. Let the market decide the affairs of the market - this is the market economy. Today, China's stockholders are no longer the three-year-old toddlers of the market's first days. They know the risks, so there is no need for that respected central organ People's Daily to issue an editorial to pour on exhortations. Cheers to the People's Daily not publishing a stock market editorial! I hope that I can continue to offer those cheers in the future. Note: This is a misprint; the editorial, China's first formal editorial on the stock market in an authoritative newspaper, was published in 1996. Here's a summary, from PD's "today in history" section. In May, 1996, after the central bank cut interest rates, the Shanghai Index began its climb from around 500 to over 1200 by December; after the editorial, it tumbled to 865. In May 1999, another strategic PD editorial sent stocks climbing upward. Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
Henry on
The Eurasian Face
Caroline W on
Big in China
Michael on
Julia Lovell on translating Lu Xun's complete fiction: "His is an angry, searing vision of China"
Brandon K. on
Clueless academic takes on popular fantasy novels
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
From 2008
Books on China
The Eurasian Face : Blacksmith Books, a publishing house in Hong Kong, is behind The Eurasian Face, a collection of photographs by Kirsteen Zimmern. Below is an excerpt from the series:
Big in China: An adapted excerpt from Big In China: My Unlikely Adventures Raising A Family, Playing The Blues and Becoming A Star in China, just published this month. Author Alan Paul tells the story of arriving in Beijing as a trailing spouse, starting a blues band, raising kids and trying to make sense of China.
Pallavi Aiyar's Chinese Whiskers: Pallavi Aiyar's first novel, Chinese Whiskers, a modern fable set in contemporary Beijing, will be published in January 2011. Aiyar currently lives in Brussels where she writes about Europe for the Business Standard. Below she gives permissions for an excerpt.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Korean history doesn't fly on Chinese TV screens (2007.09): SARFT puts the kibbosh on Korean historical dramas. + Religion and government in an uneasy mix (2008.03): Phoenix Weekly (凤凰周刊) article from October, 2007, on government influence on religious practice in Tibet. + David Moser on Mao impersonators (2004.10): I first became aware of this phenomenon in 1992 when I turned on a Beijing TV variety show and was jolted by the sight of "Mao Zedong" and "Zhou Enlai" playing a game of ping pong. They both gave short, rousing speeches, and then were reverently interviewed by the emcee, who thanked them profusely for taking time off from their governmental duties to appear on the show.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on Stock market trembles at a fake People's Daily editorial
I disagree. It's not about treating investors like children, it's about taking the edge off of a speculative frenzy. This is one of the more benign functions of government - in the wake of the tech bubble, remember, Alan Greenspan warned against "irrational exuberance".
There is no doubt in my mind that the Shanghai and Shenzhen indexes are in the midst of an irrational, unsustainable upturn. These markets have shot up nearly vertically in the past six months, and a correction is bound to happen. The longer it waits, the more painful it will be.
Good point, Chris.
I thought the "placed editorial" angle was interesting in this piece - it (and a number of other op-ed reactions) make reference to "old practices" which I guess aren't supposed to be done anymore. One piece wondered what it says about People's Daily that an article can send tremors through the market merely by claiming to be the PD's lead editorial - the additional layer between the government's decisions and what the market hears gives this sort of rumor more room to spread.