|
Business and Finance
Stock market trembles at a fake People's Daily editorialPosted by Joel Martinsen, April 26, 2007 11:27 PM
![]() Turns out it was all just a hoax. Though the government is supposed to have left behind the old practices of planting editorials to implement policy changes, investors have long memories - the fake resembled a real editorial that PD ran in 1996, after which the market tanked. Here's a short comment on the issue by Southern Weekly's Guo Guangdong: People's Daily won't publish a stock market editorial. Good!by Guo Guangdong / SW"People's Daily will issue an important editorial against the stock market!" The stock market experienced dramatic tremors today on the influence of this rumor; market confidence declined sharply from several days before, and a sense of panic and desire to flee was in evidence. These two days, an article titled "People's Daily Editorial" has been circulating online. The "editorial" began: "Since 2005, the stock market has steadily risen, rising sharply from 2006 on. From 2006 to 2007, the Shanghai Composite Index has risen 300%, and the Shenzhen Index has risen 340%....we ought to have a sober understanding of the conditions of the our country's stock market." As stock market averages have been hitting new highs, this type of information strikes like a lightning bolt at the weak hearts of old stockholders. Many people remember the People's Daily editorial of 16 December, 1999* - "A correct understanding of the current stock market" - as if it were yesterday. When this signed commentary "warning of the stock market's risks" was published, the market tumbled over several days and investors were struck dumb with anxiety. In this way, a long bear market started because of an editorial. So when this type of "editorial" reappears today, can investors avoid panicking? Fortunately, the media asked for confirmation from People's Daily: this piece of news was pure rumor; People's Daily had no plan to publish an editorial on the stock market. However, the reason the so-called "People's Daily Editorial" was able to spread so widely and with such real effects is not hard to see: the spectre of the "policy market" looms large in people's minds. The old habit of using a People's Daily editorial to prop up or push down the market should no longer be given space to breathe. In short, let the government have what belongs to the goverment, and let the market have what belongs to the market. Managers are responsible for oversight, investors are responsible for investing; bridges are bridges and roads are roads. Let the market decide the affairs of the market - this is the market economy. Today, China's stockholders are no longer the three-year-old toddlers of the market's first days. They know the risks, so there is no need for that respected central organ People's Daily to issue an editorial to pour on exhortations. Cheers to the People's Daily not publishing a stock market editorial! I hope that I can continue to offer those cheers in the future. Note: This is a misprint; the editorial, China's first formal editorial on the stock market in an authoritative newspaper, was published in 1996. Here's a summary, from PD's "today in history" section. In May, 1996, after the central bank cut interest rates, the Shanghai Index began its climb from around 500 to over 1200 by December; after the editorial, it tumbled to 865. In May 1999, another strategic PD editorial sent stocks climbing upward. Links and Sources
There are currently 2 Comments for Stock market trembles at a fake People's Daily editorial.
Comments on Stock market trembles at a fake People's Daily editorialI disagree. It's not about treating investors like children, it's about taking the edge off of a speculative frenzy. This is one of the more benign functions of government - in the wake of the tech bubble, remember, Alan Greenspan warned against "irrational exuberance". There is no doubt in my mind that the Shanghai and Shenzhen indexes are in the midst of an irrational, unsustainable upturn. These markets have shot up nearly vertically in the past six months, and a correction is bound to happen. The longer it waits, the more painful it will be. Good point, Chris. I thought the "placed editorial" angle was interesting in this piece - it (and a number of other op-ed reactions) make reference to "old practices" which I guess aren't supposed to be done anymore. One piece wondered what it says about People's Daily that an article can send tremors through the market merely by claiming to be the PD's lead editorial - the additional layer between the government's decisions and what the market hears gives this sort of rumor more room to spread. |
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
Joyce Lau on
"I just went to take a bath"
Anon on
The Grabbing Class
Yan Xishan on
How to be cool in Beijing
kangnick on
A handbook for staying healthy and regular
Danwei.TV
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Books on China
In Wang Shuo's No Man's Land: Geremie Barme addresses Wang Shuo's 千万别把我当人.
Swimming with Mao, a memoir essay: This memoir piece is by Xujun Eberlein, author of the new short story book Apologies Forthcoming'.
Long Hair Drama, by Zhang Lijia: An except from Zhang Lijia's book 'Socialism is Great!: A Worker's Memoir of the New China'.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Yu Qiuyu on the hardships of reading (2007.07): Yu Qiuyu (余秋雨) writes about trunks of books. + Churches and the market economy (2006.07): A translation of Zhao Xiao's famous essay, 'Market Economies with Churches and Market Economies without Churches', and a critique by CASS academician He Fan. + Learning about America from prison flicks (2006.12): What Hollywood is teaching the world through prison films and TV shows like Prison Break and The Shawshank Redemption
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |


