Censorship

Nobel news blackout lifted: The Party Strikes Back

Liu_Xiaobo-300.jpg
Rebel scum (Wikipedia)

On October 14th, the Chinese Communist Party's Propaganda Department relaxed their total news blackout around Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo. Major online news portals, including Netease and Sina, seem to have been instructed to prominently position a pair of Xinhua Daily articles that respond to the Nobel announcement.

The two articles, physically positioned high up on the news portal websites, are titled "From the Dalai Lama to Liu Xiaobo: What the Nobel Peace Prize Tells Us" and "Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo was an Especially Big Mistake."

Following days of media blackout, the strong push behind the two articles suggests that the Party's propaganda apparatus is finally gearing up to 'lead public opinion,' a media control strategy used by the Party since 2005. Before 2005, the Party typically responded to negative events by suppressing all related news stories. Over the last five years, however, the Party's more common reaction to politically sensitive news has been to temporarily block all reports, craft an official version of events, and order media outlets to publish only the official version.

On October 8th, the day of the Nobel Peace Prize announcement, Xinhua published online the negative reaction of Ma Chaoxu, the spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry. But, the Nobel news was then instantly scrubbed from China’s domestic on- and offline media, and keyword filters were set in place to block discussion and searches of the Nobel Prize or Liu Xiaobo.

The two new articles illustrate the Party’s line of attack: discredit both the recipient and the prize, and cast the award as an attempt by Western forces to control China.

“From the Dalai Lama to Liu Xiaobo” begins with the money quote [translated here]:

A few people abroad have reacted to the news with joy, frolicking around as though they’ve taken drugs. One of these people is the Dalai Lama, who won the Peace Prize in 1989.

It’s a good thing the Dalai Lama came out [to congratulate Liu Xiaobo] because it reminds every Chinese person to think about why these two men won the Nobel Peace Prize. What’s the underlying link?

This question is immediately answered: “The Dalai Lama and Liu Xiaobo are the political dolls of Western forces.” From there, the author repeats the Party line on Tibet and the Dalai Lama (he’s a splittist) and connects him to Liu Xiaobo. The hoped for effect is to turn the Dalai Lama into a pair of concrete boots for Liu, helping him on his swim through Chinese public opinion.

The piece moves on to make the more legitimate point that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given to a few shady characters, and not given to others who may have been more deserving, like Gandhi.

The article ends by imploring readers to guard against various attempts by Western forces to contain China. “The time of the award is not an accident.” From “Tibetan independence,” and “currency wars,” to “military maneuvers” and the “Diaoyu Islands incident,” Western forces are attempting to “gain unilateral economic benefit” and “contain China militarily.”

Xinhua released the second article, “Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo was an Especially Big Mistake,” in both English and Chinese, so interested readers can click through below. The article quotes heavily from Arnulf Kolstad, a professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, who believes that Liu Xiaobo’s actions did not fulfill the Nobel Peace Prize’s criteria.

Keyword filters are still in effect across various news portals, but Baidu is now linking to these two stories when searches are performed on ‘Liu Xiaobo.’

Links and Sources
There are currently 11 Comments for Nobel news blackout lifted: The Party Strikes Back.

Comments on Nobel news blackout lifted: The Party Strikes Back

So the news blackout didn't work. But it took them 6 days to figure it out.

A delay is expected to give the propaganda department enough time to come up with a unified and what they think well reasoned response to the public. I do not think it was their intention to indefinitely black out the news in the first place.

I wish the Dalai Lama hadn't thrown in his congratulations. It obviously didn't help anything, although I don't expect that the Chinese public is going to swallow the official story hook, line and sinker.

The feelings of the Chinese people have been hurt...

I am genearlly a believer in the saying that a nation gets the government it deserves. The liberal Western nations have democratic governments because the people fought and died to put them there.

Democracy is not a right, it is a privilege that has to be earned by a population that refuses to be treated like cattle. Ultimately, the Chinese must do this themselves.


Ministry of Tofu:

But does it take any self-respecting spin doctor six days to make up some BS press release? 24 hours surely.

William:

Looks like some beg to differ. :/

Good to see the Nobel award going to someone worthwhile.

Mr Kolstadt was reportedly misquoted, or not quoted at all -
link, link

It appears that the report that Mr. Kolstadt was misquoted was a fabrication by the good folks at Boxun.

It's like every news story is a FOX-esque opinion piece.

After reading the Xinhua article, I really have to wonder if someone paid off Kolstadt to say those things.

Not that he is completely wrong, but he practically adopts the CCP party line word for word, hitting all the talking points like he was reading a list. Even Chinese people don't parrot the propaganda like this. I understand if some outsiders see China that way, and I see where he's coming from, but the whole thing is almost too perfect, too artificial. Did Xinhua cherry pick his words? IMO, his comments are highly suspect. Perhaps a Norwegian could clear up who Mr. Kolstadt really is?

I hear Our Idiot prescribes 300 years of colonialism, as a cure for China's ailments. T/F?

China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
laomo2010x80.jpg
From 2008
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Culture and corporate propaganda in Soho Xiaobao (2007.11): Mid-2007 issues of Soho Xiaobao (SOHO小报), illustrating the complicated identity of in-house magazines run by real estate companies.
+ Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship (2010.03): Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship at an officially sanctioned meeting in Shenzhen.
+ Crowd-sourced cheating on the 2010 gaokao (2010.06): A student in Sichuan seeks help with the ancient Chinese section of this year's college entrance exam -- while the test is going on!
Danwei Archives