Charity

The Chinese Red Cross and its critics

On The China Beat blog, Caroline Reeves writes:

History of the Chinese Red Cross

The Chinese Red Cross Society, which is the subject of a chapter I contributed to a recent University of Hawaii Press book, was founded over 100 years ago. It was established not by Americans or Britons or even Swiss intent on bringing their humanitarian institutions to China, but by the Chinese themselves. The Chinese Red Cross Society is a profoundly Chinese institution, much as the American Red Cross is deeply American and the Japanese Red Cross is inextricably Japanese. It is one of China’s most enduring social welfare institutions, outlasting diverse governments, changing conceptions of social welfare and dramatic policy swings on international involvement.

Meanwhile, on the Seagull Reference blog:

NetEase Terminated Partnership with China Red Cross

Netease issued an announcement to terminate partnership with China Red Cross in the earthquake relief operation after China Red Cross refused to make the amount of donations available to the public. Effective 22:00 of May 14, 2008, donations made through Netease will be passed to other charities that accept openness. China Red Cross is the original designated beneficiary.

It is not rare to see disaster relief money fail to reach the hands of victims. In a publicized incident after a disaster in 2003, in a RBM 59,060,000 relief grant from the National government, only RMB 500,000 reached hands of victims after two years.

Links and Sources
 
There are currently 5 Comments for The Chinese Red Cross and its critics.

Comments on The Chinese Red Cross and its critics

"It is not rare to see disaster relief money fail to reach the hands of victims. In a publicized incident after a disaster in 2003, in a RBM 59,060,000 relief grant from the National government, only RMB 500,000 reached hands of victims after two years."

Which is why I still refuse to give a single yuan to any of the collection buckets being shaken under my nose. The fear of 8 mao ending up paying for some provincial party member's mistress is a genuine one.

I am surprised and yet not surprised that the China Red Cross should be getting criticism here. I saw a piece about them on the TV news and the whole set up seemed chaotic. Dozens of staff fingering their way through great wads of RMB, while dozens more "staff" hovered in the background.

In these situations, there is just no-one to trust, painful as that is. Contributions should as much as possible be material, although even then I wouldn't put it past some of these cronies to enter the tent selling business in a year's time with a huge stockpile to get rid of.

anyone else having trouble with hotmail/youtube these days?

Maybe this earthquake will spur many movements towards more accountability, sunshine laws and good governance?

Wishful thinking on my part.

Yes, having trouble with hotmail.

Interesting. The reason cited by Netease is the exact same reason I refuse to donate to the American Red Cross. They have a habit of taking in donations that people make for a specific cause and spreading it throughout the organization rather than the donor's intended recipient. This became an issue of contention after Hurricane Katrina.

Post a comment

All comments are moderated and subject to review by Danwei contributors and editors, but well-grounded and articulate comments will be published regardless of which way they lean. Because comments published on any website ultimately contribute to the character of that website, we may decline to publish comments that are irrelevant, redundant, or that do not adhere to generally accepted standards of courtesy; if you are looking for a fight, there are plenty of other venues available online.


Some useful html: <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i>,
<a href="http://www.danwei.org">link</a>

Corruption