Crime

Han Han: "Children, you're spoiling grandpa's fun"

Bad boy novelist, blogger and racing car driver recently posted some thoughts about Chinese media coverage of the recent school attacks in China, titled "Children, you're spoiling grandpa's fun." The blog post was soon deleted by the blog nannies at Sina.com, but not before Julian Smisek translated it:

Children, you're spoiling grandpa's fun

by Han Han, translated by Julian Smisek

A man hacked up 32 children at Taixing nursery school. It's not clear whether any of them were killed. Because this news came so soon after the last attack on Nanping nursery school, I actually thought it was the same school.

In these recent attacks, the twisted murderers have all chosen to attack nursery schools and elementary schools, believing this to be the best way to exact their revenge on society. It has become fashionable to go to nursery schools and elementary schools and kill people. There, the murderer faces the least resistance and can kill the most people, causing us to feel the greatest pain and panic. This is indeed the most effective method to exact revenge on society.

With the exception of Yang Jia [a man who killed six police at a Shanghai police department in 2008], nearly every murderer has chosen to attack the weak. In a society without an exit, killing weaker people has become their only exit. I propose that local governments across the country send their building security guards to protect nursery schools. A government that can't protect children doesn't need that many guards.

These murders have mostly come about because society is unjust and unfair. Yes, justice should be made more glorious than the sun. That said, the sun doesn't come out every day. Haven't there been a bit too many cloudy days and dark nights? Saying justice should be more glorious than the sun isn't impressive. What's impressive is every minute the sun shines on your head.

News about the Taixing nursery school homicide has been controlled. These children were born at the wrong time [unlucky], and died at an even worse one. According to relevant departments, within this festive atmosphere [the opening of the Shanghai Expo], this incident should be categorized as noise. We know only that 32 children were injured during the Taixing nursery school incident. Government and hospital officials repeatedly emphasize that not a single child died, but word on the street is that many did. Tell me, who should I believe? You say, 'believe the government.' Well, then why have they forbidden parents from seeing their children? Why have have they blocked off the hospitals and the news. There aren't pictures or videos of the kids. Moreover, if a knife-wielding attacker hacks up 32 people and not a single person died, is he a murderer or a surgeon? That's just too careful. You say, 'believe the word on the street.' But, rumors are always exaggerated. We have no pictures and we have no truth. We can't believe those either. I did an internet search for 'Taixing', and the only results that appeared were official government taking points. So, I searched for 'Taizhou,' and the only news piece that appeared was "Taizhou's three lucky blessings." That was on April 30th.

I'm totally astonished. By blocking off information and the hospital, controlling the media, prohibiting visits, and changing the subject, the Taizhou government has successfully diverted our anger from the killer onto themselves. What's the point of all this? You assume they must have some motive. Actually, they don't -- except to conform with the World Expo's "Harmonious Gathering" [a song sung by Jackie Chan and Song Zuying during the opening ceremony]. This is only government inertia. It's just how the government handles similar incidents. They have a seven step process: something happens in the middle of their meal. They cover it up, and pull it aside, get rid of the media, ban mention of it, issue official talking points, hand out some money, and cremate it. They then continue with their meal.

If it's true that no one died, lift the ban on the media and allow the parents to visit their children. It seems that you'll only be happy if this becomes a group incident.

Actually, a lot of group incidents start like this: the government holds in its fist a 1 RMB coin that it took from some ordinary people. The people say they don't want it back, but they want to see that it's there. The government is simply unwilling, no matter what, to open its hand. It says that it's already told them that there's a 1 RMB coin in there. But, the people are worried and say that it isn't a big deal to just show them the coin. So then the government invites its servant, Xinhua News. The servant says that although it too hasn't seen the coin, it can indeed confirm that the coin is there. 'It's enough for you to hear it from me, others shouldn't spread rumors.' After this the government says, 'alright my servant's confirmed it. Now get lost.' The people get angry and call over several friends. The friends then tell passersby that someone has stolen money and is unwilling to return it. More and more people arrive at the scene, with the government standing in the center. It is still clutching the coin in its fist, incessantly saying that it has a 1 RMB coin, and that you shouldn't listen to rumors -- otherwise you might be arrested according to the law. This incites the crowd, which says, 'who are you, as someone whose inner character is that of a thief, to threaten me with arrest?' The law can't be enforced when so many people are violating it. More people are called over. When they arrive they recognize who's clutching the coin. 'He's the guy who's bullied us.' Everyone begins to attack, until -- at the last moment -- the government finally opens its hand and says, 'look!' But by that point it's no longer important whether he has 1 RMB or 50 cents -- the situation is already out of control.

Their method of handling problems isn't more or less noble than the murderer's. It's not surprising that a nursery school hung a banner that said, 'if you want answers, go around the corner to the left and ask the government.' (I can see people objecting, saying that with regard to the news and media, the Taizhou government does not have any jurisdiction. I think everybody knows this. However according to the law, critism of the government can at most go up to the city level (not including directly-government cities), so for now we can only limit our speculation to the Taizhou city government -- with the mayor being the highest person responsible. As long as the city's party secretary doesn't get into trouble, this speculation should be considered correct).

Within the short span of a month, there have been five attacks on school campuses. Within the short span of a week, there have been two, on the 29th of April in Taixing and 30th of April in Weifang. I don't want to investigate the social reasons; I just want to tell everyone that it's only here that it isn't considered social news when a person breaks into a nursery school and hacks up 32 kids. Together, 32 kids is greater than a 100 year-old kid.

Children, you were hacked up and not one newspaper wrote about you because a few hundred kilometers away, a festival had begun. There, hundreds of millions of fireworks were being set off, while at your home in Taizhou, the city celebrated an international tourism festival, trade talks, and the opening of an overseas Chinese town -- the three lucky blessings.

Perhaps in the eyes of those grandpas, you are too depressing.

Pitiful children, you are the ones that were poisoned by powdered milk. You are the ones that were hurt by vaccinations. You are the ones who were crushed to death by earthquakes. You are the ones were were burned to death. Even though it was adults whose regulations caused the problems, you were the ones who were attacked by a knife-wielding adult bent on repaying society. I hope that what the Taizhou government says is true, that you all have only been hurt and that not one of you is dead. After the elderly have lost their jobs and you have grown up, I hope that you not only protect your own children, but also make this society protect all children.

Note: After his blog post was deleted, Han Han published a short note titled "." and containing only the text: "Grandpas, please enjoy yourselves."

Correction: With help from some readers, this translation was edited for accuracy on May 6th, 2010.

Links and Sources
There are currently 15 Comments for Han Han: "Children, you're spoiling grandpa's fun".

Comments on Han Han: "Children, you're spoiling grandpa's fun"

This guy rocks

Hey, I think you will be interested in this.

Can you post the original Chinese version too? If not, where can I find it?

Hey Ray, you can find Han Han's original version at his bullogger mirror site.

Here is a copy of it on Bulloger.

Did Han Han edit his piece? Your version seems to be longer with additional paragraphs than the translation over at chinaSMACK and than original Chinese copy at Bulloger.

Hi Kai,

It seems that Han Han (or someone else) did edit his post to exclude the paragraph on mass incidents. I translated the RSS version piped from his blog straight to my Google Reader. Here is the Chinese original (notice the last sentence of paragraph five and all of paragraph six):

泰兴幼儿园中的小孩也被人砍了,32人受伤,死亡情况不明。这个新闻因为离开上一次南平幼儿园袭击的新闻太近,我甚至一度误以为是同一个幼儿园。

在最近的变态凶手杀人事件中,他们都选择了幼儿园和小学,相信在很多想报复社会的人心中,去幼儿园小学杀人成为了一种时尚,因为在杀人过程中,你将遇到最少的抵抗,杀掉最多的人,造成民间最大的痛苦的恐慌,是最有效的报复社会手段。除了杨佳以外,几乎所有杀手都挑选了向弱者下手。这个社会没有出口,杀害更弱者成了他们唯一的出口。我建议把全国地方政府门卫间里的保安们抽调去保护幼儿园,孩子都保护不了的政府不需要那么多人保护。

这些杀人事件的产生很大原因是这个社会不公正,不公平。是的,让公平正义比太阳还要有光辉。但太阳不是每天都出。我们的阴天和黑夜是否稍微太多了一些?所以,提出让公平正义比太阳还要有光辉并不伟大,做到让太阳分分钟都挂在你头顶上才伟大。

在泰兴幼儿园杀人事件中,新闻被控制了,这些孩子们生不逢时,死更不逢时。在相关部门的认识里,在这喜庆的气氛里,这事当属杂音。我们只知道,泰兴幼儿园杀人事件中,受伤32人,政府和医院一再强调,无一死亡,但是坊间又传说,死了多个孩子。你说我应该相信谁呢?相信政府吧,那为什么他们禁止家长见到孩子呢?还封锁着医院和新闻,没有孩子的照片和视频,况且一个杀人用刀劈了32个人,结果一个没死,那他到底是在杀人还是在做手术呢,也太小心了。相信传闻吧,毕竟传闻都是喜欢往夸张了传的,我们无图无真相,也不能相信。我搜索了泰兴,出现的全都是通稿,于是我一搜索泰州,出现的新闻居然是——《泰州近日三喜临门》,日期是4月30日。

我只是非常的诧异,泰州政府通过了封锁消息,封锁医院,控制媒体,禁止探望,转移视线,等手段,居然成功的将人们对于杀手的愤怒转移到了自己身上,这是何苦。你以为他有什么目的,其实不是的,除了要配合世博会《和谐欢歌》以外,这只是惯性,是政府处理类似事件的习惯,是七步曲:吃饭喝酒到一半,出事了—— 隐瞒,隔离,撤媒体,发禁令,发通稿,赔钱,火化——继续吃饭喝酒。如果真的没有人死亡的话,开放媒体和家长探望便是,非要搞成群体事件才高兴。

很多群体事件的发生其实是这样的,政府手里握着从老百姓那里搞来的一块钱硬币,老百姓表示自己不会要回去,但是想看一看,政府死活不肯把手摊开来,表示他已经说了,里面有一块钱,老百姓急了,说那你给我看看还不成么,于是政府请来自己的仆人新华社,仆人表示,虽然俺也没见过,但里面的确是有一块钱,你听我的就行了,别人不用多嘴。然后政府说,好了,我仆人证明了,你滚。老百姓就怒了,叫来很多朋友,朋友再对路人说,有人抢钱还死活不肯还。于是人越来越多,政府还握着硬币站在那里,不停的说,我手里的的确是一块钱,你们不要听信谣言,否则依法逮捕。群众就激动了,你一个本质就是抢钱的还逮捕我呢,法不责众,叫更多的人来,更多的人来了以后一看,表示握着硬币的这个孙子我们认识,他也来欺负过我们,于是大家都扑了上去,到最后的关头,政府把手一摊,说,你看。但这个时候里面究竟是一块钱还是五毛钱已经不重要了,事态已经失控。

他们处理问题的手段不比凶手高尚多少,也难怪在网上看到有幼儿园挂出横幅——冤有头债有主,出门左转是政府。(我看到有人提出抗议,表示媒体和新闻这一块,泰州政府没有这个权力来控制,我想这个大家都知道,但是根据中华人民共和国批评法,对政府的批评最高只能到市一级(不包括直辖市),所以我们暂时只能推算到泰州市政府为止,最高责任人只能是泰州市市长,市委书记只要没有落马,就必须正确。)

短短的一个多月内,五起校园凶杀案件,短短的一周以内,就发生了两起,4月29日,泰兴,4月30日,潍坊。我不想去探讨其中的社会原因,只想告诉大家,也就在这里,一个人冲进幼儿园砍了32个小孩是不能上社会新闻的,32个加起来才超过一百岁的孩子,你们被砍了,连个报纸都不给你上,因为在几百公里以外,召开了一个盛会,那里光烟花就放了上亿,同时在你们的家乡泰州,要召开国际旅游节,经贸洽谈会和华侨城开业典礼,正三喜临门。

也许在那些爷爷们眼里,你们,是扫兴的。

但是,我们可怜的孩子们,奶粉毒害的是你们,疫苗伤害的是你们,地震压死的是你们,被火烧死的是你们。就算是成人们的规则出了问题,被成人用刀报复的也是你们。我愿望真的像泰州政府说的一样,你们全部都只是受伤,无一死亡。年长者失职了,愿你们长大以后,不光要庇护你们自己的孩子,还要让这个社会庇护所有人的孩子。

While he draws attention to the Grandpas, he makes sure that people know he is talking about the oldies in the LOCAL government and not their bosses in Zhongnanhai. As a race car driver, he sure knows where the gas pedal is and where the brake is.

Hey Julian, thanks for the follow-up! I wonder who did the editing, whether he did it after his initial post or if someone edited after they reposted him. Cheers.

sao-xing may better translated as
spoiling the moment/spoiling the fun

it refers to the breaking news that interrupted the feast/meal the officials were enjoying in the 7-step playbook.

Re: comment about limiting the critism to local government, the sentences in parenthesis in the 4th to last paragraph could be better translated:

(I can see people objecting, saying that with regard to the news and media, the Taizhou government does not have any jurisdiction, I think everybody knows that. However according to the law, critism of the government can at most involve the city level (not including directly-government cities), so for now we can only limit our speculation to the Taizhou city government, with the mayor being the highest person responsible. So long the city's party secretary doesn't get into trouble, this speculation should be considered correct).

Which seems to me to be raising a much stronger point by noting the lack of jurisdiction of the Taizhou government to control the media and at the same time being the highest level of government that one is legally allowed to criticise publicly.

Some people are naturally closer to 真理, like Han Han.

Sun-bin and random random,

Thanks for your help improving the accuracy of the translation. I've added your suggestions. I'm new at this, and need all the help I can get.

-J

Although I agree with Han Han in general - I do see another side to this. I think the Chinese government may also seek to minimize on potential copycat killers. You can of course argue the merits, but I believe there is at least a another perspective in which to view their actions.

god way to express yourself.keep it up

China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
laomo2010x80.jpg
From 2008
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Culture and corporate propaganda in Soho Xiaobao (2007.11): Mid-2007 issues of Soho Xiaobao (SOHO小报), illustrating the complicated identity of in-house magazines run by real estate companies.
+ Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship (2010.03): Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship at an officially sanctioned meeting in Shenzhen.
+ Crowd-sourced cheating on the 2010 gaokao (2010.06): A student in Sichuan seeks help with the ancient Chinese section of this year's college entrance exam -- while the test is going on!
Danwei Archives