|
Featured Video
Why Tom Doctoroff is wrong about ChinaPosted by Jeremy Goldkorn, May 5, 2008 4:17 PM
A video interview by Thomas Crampton with Paul French who begs to differ with ad agency JWT's China chief. UPDATE: Doctoroff responds: |
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
affordabe on
Blogspot unblocked, but Blogger is blocked
Adam J. Sc on
Snow in Beijing
Peter Kauf on
Bound feet in China
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Xujun Eberlein's Apologies Forthcoming: Hong Kong's Blacksmith Books has published a short story collection by Xujun Eberlein.
Princess Der Ling: Two Years in the Forbidden City: Two years in the Forbidden City is largely a reminiscence of the minutiae of life for one of history's most powerful women, by one of her court attendants, a Manchu noble's daughter by the name of Der Ling.
Carl Crow's The Long Road Back to China: In 1939 Carl Crow - an American journalist, advertising executive and author who had lived in Shanghai for 25 years until forced out by the Japanese - travelled up the Burma Road from Rangoon to Chongqing on assignment for Liberty magazine - 'the most interesting assignment I have ever been given'.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ The 'national' in National Day (2006.10): Xiao Feng writes about China's national flavor, national curse, national bird, national car, and so forth, Dongfang Yu writes on the true meaning of China's National Day in the age of angry youth. + Don't ask so laowai don't have to tell (2008.07): An essay was written by Geremie Barmé, scholar, filmmaker and author of the new book The Forbidden City. + Religion and government in an uneasy mix (2008.03): Phoenix Weekly (凤凰周刊) article from October, 2007, on government influence on religious practice in Tibet.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |





Comments on Why Tom Doctoroff is wrong about China
Paul French & Tom Doctoroff are two sides of the same western-minted coin that's been circulating through China since the late-Qing: the former, a dyed-in-the-wool China-basher; and the latter, a shameless huckster/shill for crony-capitalism.
First why would anyone in their right mind take credit for Buick at all?
If it were Cadillac, then I could see arguing about it.
"For anyone to assume that “everything” has been seen before discredits that extraordinary genius of the Chinese people and their ability to adapt to an evolving world without sacrificing their enduring cultural orientation."---Tom Doctoroff
Without sacrificing culture? What culture? Nothing is preserved---short of 1000 year old eggs---in that country.
"It also denigrates the efforts of, yes, expatriate businessmen who, while far from perfect and certainly not always noble, have done their part to make China a more dynamic place as the 21st century unfolds."---Tom Doctoroff
Do any any expat businessmen care if they are denigrated? Hell no. We are all laughing our ass off all the way to the bank. Denigrate the sh*t out of us. There is no bottom line in integrity. If integrity had a monetary value we would sell that too.
Why don't they all just admit it. The business and this argument is all based on money, money, money.
Both of you shut up, BUT first tell us its for the money and we will buy your books and have some entertainment reading them.
Nyah nyah nyah, I know you are but what am I ...
Seriously - who cares?
Only surprising thing here is Doctor Off calling unnecessary attention to himself. Doesn't that breach the Sacred Code of the Adman?