|
Foreign media on China
Nonsense reporting about ChinaPosted by Jeremy Goldkorn, October 8, 2007 10:51 AM
The October Golden week holiday seems to have stopped certain Western commentators from checking their facts about China. Here are two cases of very shoddy reporting work: Sloppy Slate Soon after, the article mentions "a new Chinese law announced in September that forbids journalists from covering stories that might undermine Chinese stability and/or the ability of the central government to respond with emergency measures." Bremmer discusses how he heard "virtually no qualms about the idea from any of the Chinese I spoke with". Fair enough; shame Bremmer did not speak to any informed Chinese people who would have told him that the draft law was amended in June this year to get rid of the emergency reporting restrictions. While he is right that ordinary Chinese people did not seem to care either way, the draft law was hotly debated by Chinese journalists and bloggers. But hey, why stick with facts when making stuff up is so much more fun: Moving on to Dalian for the first annual meeting of Global Growth Companies, I can't help but be impressed. The population of this second-tier port city in China's northeast has rocketed from 500,000 (roughly the size of Portland, Ore.) to 6 million (a bit less than Hong Kong) in just five years. Where did he get that 500,000 figure from? The China Times perhaps? Chinese government data from 2000 says that the urban areas of Dalian had a population of more than 2.5 million. Feeding us a line of bullshit China's Great Firewall turns its attention to RSS feeds Uh, no. All blogs on Sina.com, China's biggest blog host have the word blog in the URL, and there are plenty of URLs and feeds that include the terms "rss" and "feed" that do not trip the Chinese Net Nanny's filters. Ars Technica feed are inaccessible in China because it is run through Feedburner's server (feeds.feedburner.com), which is blocked. Unfortunately, uber-blog Boing Boing linked to this piece of nonsense. |
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
AllSeeingE on
Send a postcard to the future
Peter Andr on
Cats and dogs in the animal cruelty law
hanmeng on
Al Jazeera on potential dog meat ban
singingblu on
2012: a disaster movie not suitable for children
NINGT on
Goons and thugs
Len Chiu on
The body in the lake
Christie on
Pole dancing: for fitness, not about sex
Media Partners
Visit these sites for the latest China news
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
 Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
 Diamond Hill by Feng Chi-shun: Feng's memoir Diamond Hill describes an era of gambling and gangsters, Suzie Wong and squatter villages, fires and food stalls, and the Kowloon Walled City and its white powder. "A time when people were poor, but life was rich," he says. The world that he grew up in no longer exists, but his book - the first ever on the Diamond Hill refugee settlement, in either Chinese or English - offers a candid picture of what life was like for most Hong Kong residents in the 1950s.
William A. Callahan's China: The Pessoptimist Nation: China: The Pessoptimist Nation shows how the heart of Chinese foreign policy is not a security dilemma, but an identity dilemma. Through a careful analysis of how Chinese people understand their new place in the world, the book charts how Chinese identity emerges through the interplay of positive and negative feelings in a dynamic that intertwines China's domestic and international politics.
The WTO ruling: a half victory at best: In August 2009, a World Trade Organization panel ruled against China's system of monopoly control over entertainment products. Was this the victory supporters hailed as the dawn of a new day for American and global entertainment companies in the China market?
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Street hawker cries of Beijing (2006.12): Yang Changhe demonstrates hawker's cries in a video shot by Muzimei. + New Weekly: Do Chinese kids know anything about traditonal Chinese culture? (2004.06): Q: Do you know what China's four great inventions are? Paper, printing, the compass and gunpowder 49.3% know all four, 37.3% get one or more wrong, 13.3% don't know at all (2004.06.12) + Some questions about SARFT's full-stop for Red Question Mark (2007.09): SARFT axes Red Question Mark (红问号). He Dong (何东) responds.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
 (on the mainland)or Feedburner  (blocked in China) Main feed: Main posts (FB has top links) Top Links: Links from the top bar Danwei Jobs: Want ads Danwei Digest: Updated daily, 19:30 |
 |
Chinese media, advertising, and urban life. |
|
tweet
facebook
bookmark
HaoHao
digg
Comments on Nonsense reporting about China
Feedburner.com isn't blocked, just the server that actually does the feeding: 66.150.96.119.
It's not being keyword triggered, that IP is blacklisted.
Tough call on who's the bigger boob: the GFW for annoying people without actually censoring anything or the ArsT writer for being a silly ass.
Fair enough on the slapping down lazy journalism, Jeremy.
But.... bloggers can't be "ordinary people" too??
Thanks, jim. I've made that point a bit clearer in the post itself.
I'd wager that a lot of the complaints about keyword-filtered feeds are the result of blogs redirecting local URLs to feeds.feedburner.com.
You'd win that bet.
It's not only feeds.feedburner.com. Feedburner has that mydomain service that allows you to keep your domain as part of the feed, but with the DNS record pointing to their IP address.
The Gawker media sites all use it (feeds.gawker.com), but because it goes to the naughty IP address they won't work. Sites themselves are fine.
As much as I relish a good conspiracy theory, I think that someone at GFW HQ blocked it one day and just can't be bothered to change it back.
I have to agree with you on the Slate article. There's this bizarre tendency for news magazines to not get non-specialists and people who only have a cursory knowledge of China to write these articles. Ian Bremmer is well-respected, so I've heard, but why is he giving the report on the state of China? The "no-one I spoke to" factor is especially nauseating when they clearly are on a tight schedule and are working with a tiny sample size. I hope more people link to your post on this...
Fair enough.
But then again, given you have that insipid feature, "Sexy Beijing", it is rather tough to take shots at others for bad journalism.
SinaSource,
I dont have a problem with sexy beijing. In fact I recommended the series to some faculty members in our school who are interested in China. Did this card-carrying Chinese patriot miss something sinister in sexy beijing? I thought it was cool.
Put simply, it demeans Chinese.
Would those "faculty members" be, in fact, fellow English language teachers?
In that case, they are not faculty nor are they professors, though many claim to be, even though they lack advanced degrees or have never served in positions in universities outside of China. But they come here, teach English, and all of a sudden, they are "professors" and "faculty members".
I fear that the series appeals to people who have not the least bit of understanding of China, apart from Lonely Planet.