|
Front Page of the Day
2012: a disaster movie not suitable for childrenPosted by Joel Martinsen, November 17, 2009 6:38 PM
Today's Chengdu Evening News aims to stir up some controversy with a feature on the new disaster movie 2012, which opened last week. "Should 2012 be stopped?" asks the headline at the bottom of the page. Hong Jiantao (洪剑涛), an actor best known for his role in a sitcom about military cooks, had such a strong reaction to the film that he called for it to be pulled from screens. He posted the following to his blog at 6:21 in the morning of November 14:
Although China's portrayal in 2012 has generally been seen as positive, the decision to make the country's citizens and military instrumental in a plan to salvage the remnants of humanity has also been interpreted as a cynical ploy on the part of the film-makers for a large box office in China. Additionally, some critics have pointed out that China's role in the plot is to provide massive amounts of manpower in the form of unskilled laborers who not qualified to be saved on the arks they themselves help to build. The newspaper report quotes a few sentences from a blog post by Tan Fei, a well-known film critic. Tan laughed off Hong's warning about the dangers of 2012 and put his own spin on the portrayal of the PRC:
Tan concludes:
Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
AllSeeingE on
Send a postcard to the future
Peter Andr on
Cats and dogs in the animal cruelty law
hanmeng on
Al Jazeera on potential dog meat ban
singingblu on
2012: a disaster movie not suitable for children
NINGT on
Goons and thugs
Len Chiu on
The body in the lake
Christie on
Pole dancing: for fitness, not about sex
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Diamond Hill by Feng Chi-shun: Feng's memoir Diamond Hill describes an era of gambling and gangsters, Suzie Wong and squatter villages, fires and food stalls, and the Kowloon Walled City and its white powder. "A time when people were poor, but life was rich," he says. The world that he grew up in no longer exists, but his book - the first ever on the Diamond Hill refugee settlement, in either Chinese or English - offers a candid picture of what life was like for most Hong Kong residents in the 1950s.
William A. Callahan's China: The Pessoptimist Nation: China: The Pessoptimist Nation shows how the heart of Chinese foreign policy is not a security dilemma, but an identity dilemma. Through a careful analysis of how Chinese people understand their new place in the world, the book charts how Chinese identity emerges through the interplay of positive and negative feelings in a dynamic that intertwines China's domestic and international politics.
The WTO ruling: a half victory at best: In August 2009, a World Trade Organization panel ruled against China's system of monopoly control over entertainment products. Was this the victory supporters hailed as the dawn of a new day for American and global entertainment companies in the China market?
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Street hawker cries of Beijing (2006.12): Yang Changhe demonstrates hawker's cries in a video shot by Muzimei. + New Weekly: Do Chinese kids know anything about traditonal Chinese culture? (2004.06): Q: Do you know what China's four great inventions are? Paper, printing, the compass and gunpowder 49.3% know all four, 37.3% get one or more wrong, 13.3% don't know at all (2004.06.12) + Some questions about SARFT's full-stop for Red Question Mark (2007.09): SARFT axes Red Question Mark (红问号). He Dong (何东) responds.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on 2012: a disaster movie not suitable for children
Speaking as someone involved (not at all deeply) in the film, The Message is absolutely unsuitable for children. There are scenes there that are quite literally sickening even to those of us who've been thoroughly desensitized by Western media. A scene about 10 minutes before the end comes to mind.
I haven't seen 2012, but am unaware of any mainstream US movie in which -- oh, hell, let's spoil The Message; it's no good anyway -- there is a graphic depiction, complete with sound effects, of a woman being placed, bare-crotched, on a rough hemp rope and then having her legs pulled down and dragged along the length of it, complete with sound effects. There is certainly a historical basis for this, but just as certainly there is no reason at all to consider the film suitable for children.
A few volcanoes? Pah. Cowboy the hell up, unnamed and possibly imaginary girl sitting behind the blogger. Hollywood doesn't really do blood. Neither does America, for that matter -- its own war coverage would get a 'G' rating long before "all ages" films like The Message would.
Oh for gods sake, "ancient rumors"? "Cynical ploy?" "money off of global disaster"? Any more nitpicking?
2012 isn't a horror movie, it's barely even a thriller/action. I saw it, my young niece saw it, a ton of kids in the theater saw it, what's the big deal? Which scene is there to "cry" about?
I think Hong is just angry that a foreign film is enjoying so much attention.
I'll second the comment about The Message. Both for being a terrible, terrible movie and including the aforementioned torture scene that was unsuitable for children (and unwatchable for everyone else).
But I'm willing to give Hong Jiantao the benefit of a doubt. Maybe his goal is to get a rating system in China and he thinks pointing out the violence of foreign films is politically the best way to make that happen. Because no rational person could get exercised about 2012 and be nonplussed by what gets portrayed in some mainland Chinese films.
It makes me laugh. The movie should be be given a restricted rating? I think the problem is not the movie but the attitude and knowledge about cinema of an specific person. It's clearly a science fiction movie, and no one should see it in other way, unless one wants to be misleaded. Although I agree it's not the greatest movie ever, I suggest you have fun the next time. And please, leave the reality behind when you see a movie like this again. It's more than recommendable for not getting upset for what you call China's portrayal.
The diversity of opinion in here gives me more delight than the actual content of the movie in question. I beleive, open debate and expression of different views resonate the beating heart of a healthy soceity. I wonder, are we gradually moving away, although cautiously, from the symptomatic collective drowsiness resulted from the long winters of last half century? or are we seeing the light at the end of the tunnel? Demonizing or glorifying China does not bother me either, but the different voices I hear here makes my day a sunny one, in a rainy Britain.
This movie is not scary. This movie is sad and depressing. And if someone didn't know that they went to see apocolypse movie then they are either stupid or ignorant. I would not let my 3 year old see this movie, or my 8 year old for that matter, but I'm sure that my 12 year old neighbor would love it. I said "holy shit" and "wow" and "that's unreal" a lot, but the only parts that really bothered me was all the focus on emotional stuff. They did a good job of getting you all pumped up from the disaster scenes, and then snipping back to the calm of the government officials, and then to the emotional reality of the people trying to survive. This kind of takes away your control over your own emotions. I was mad at them for making it so upsetting.
I walked into the movie expecting to get some variety to my apocalyptic dreams. Surely that night I had nothing but that the entire night, but sadly all the focus was on the emotional crap and it was mainly set in the "arc." All that emotion really overshadowed the cool disaster scenes.
And to add to my comment, it is certainly not as upsetting as some of the war movies. One that comes to mind is "Grave of the Fireflies." That one was a mind altering experience.