|
Front Page of the Day
The case of the missing Obama front pagePosted by Jeremy Goldkorn on Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 3:39 PM
The Southern Weekly, one of China's more aggressively investigative newspapers, was the only print media outlet to get an interview with Obama. Central government controlled Xinhua and CCTV did not get one-on-one interviews with the American president. The interview was published in this week's issue which came out today. You can read a translation into English of the interview on Daily Telegraph Shanghai correspondent Malcolm's Moore's blog. This afternoon, several journalists and news assistants at foreign media organizations reported on Twitter that their copies of the paper arrived today without the front page, on the back of which was the Obama interview. As Malcolm Moore points out, the interview "appears to have been carefully checked by the Propaganda ministry. Nothing controversial was published." So who removed the front pages from the news bureaux' subscription copies, and why? Who knows, but well-known Chinese journalist and blogger Michael Anti noted "Media, if you wanna understand complexity of Southern Weekend's Obama interview, pls translate this tweet" Rendered into English (with some help from Anti), the tweet in question by shifeike is:
The front page is also notable for the large in-house advertisement at the bottom that reads: "It's not every issue we have an exclusive interview, but you can come here every week to understand China". Update: The Wall Street Journal's Jason Dean has more about the missing front page. Update (2009.11.20): Obama wrote a short note to the newspaper:
Was it intended to be printed alongside the interview, in one of the spots occupied by a bottom-page ad? (JM) Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
Henry on
The Eurasian Face
Caroline W on
Big in China
Michael on
Julia Lovell on translating Lu Xun's complete fiction: "His is an angry, searing vision of China"
Brandon K. on
Clueless academic takes on popular fantasy novels
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
From 2008
Books on China
The Eurasian Face : Blacksmith Books, a publishing house in Hong Kong, is behind The Eurasian Face, a collection of photographs by Kirsteen Zimmern. Below is an excerpt from the series:
Big in China: An adapted excerpt from Big In China: My Unlikely Adventures Raising A Family, Playing The Blues and Becoming A Star in China, just published this month. Author Alan Paul tells the story of arriving in Beijing as a trailing spouse, starting a blues band, raising kids and trying to make sense of China.
Pallavi Aiyar's Chinese Whiskers: Pallavi Aiyar's first novel, Chinese Whiskers, a modern fable set in contemporary Beijing, will be published in January 2011. Aiyar currently lives in Brussels where she writes about Europe for the Business Standard. Below she gives permissions for an excerpt.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Korean history doesn't fly on Chinese TV screens (2007.09): SARFT puts the kibbosh on Korean historical dramas. + Religion and government in an uneasy mix (2008.03): Phoenix Weekly (凤凰周刊) article from October, 2007, on government influence on religious practice in Tibet. + David Moser on Mao impersonators (2004.10): I first became aware of this phenomenon in 1992 when I turned on a Beijing TV variety show and was jolted by the sight of "Mao Zedong" and "Zhou Enlai" playing a game of ping pong. They both gave short, rousing speeches, and then were reverently interviewed by the emcee, who thanked them profusely for taking time off from their governmental duties to appear on the show.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on The case of the missing Obama front page
I guess the translation of the advertisement at the bottom should be:
"Not everyone has the chance to be someone important, but from here China can be better understood."
^_^
The front page is also notable for the large in-house advertisement at the bottom that reads:
"It's not every issue we have an exclusive interview, but you can come here every week to understand China".
I think the first sentence meant otherwise:
"Not everyone can become someone,
but everyone can read here to understand china"
TheChinaTimes and heartofkafka, the ad you are referring to is on the second page of the paper, underneath the Obama interview.
The front page ad that I translated and which you can see on the uppermost image of this post, reads:
不是每一期都有独家专访
但是每一周都可以在这里读懂中国。
Maybe you should read WSJ's post on this: link
"But the Southern Weekend affair is no clear-cut case of censorship. For starters, many subscribers in Beijing did receive the full edition of the paper, interview included, and unexpurgated versions of the paper were also easily available at news stands. It would make little sense for censors to try to keep foreign journalists from seeing the article while leaving it easily accessible for Chinese readers."
"An official in the post office that distributes newspapers to the media outlets that received incomplete copied of Thursday’s Southern Weekend said the explanation was simple: The papers had arrived in the morning without their front pages, which came later in the day. She said this is a common problem with big news days. An official in the distribution department of Southern Weekend confirmed that the paper indeed had blown its production deadlines for the Thursday edition and delivered the front page late."
A written instruction by a government officer to emphasize Propaganda Ministry's prohibition of repasting this interview: link
a related pic: link
Why did Barack Obama grant an exclusive interview to Southern Weekend? It's obvious. He wanted to send a cool message to his half brother Mark who happens to live in Shenzhen, Guangdong. Isn't SW based out of Guangdong? China, it's time to bribe Mark Obama. I thought it's Chinese culture to bribe family members.
That blank page is just the subscription ad for this newspaper, why people are so imaginative?