|
Government
Wen Jiabao takes a phantom trainPosted by Joel Martinsen, June 23, 2009 9:49 AM
![]() Premier Wen Jiabao recently conducted an inspection tour of a number of industrial installations in Hebei Province. On the 21st, the State Council released a lengthy report of his activities that formed the basis for news reports the following day. The article's final sentence reported that during Wen's trip back to Beijing on the D18 EMU train, the premier spoke with ordinary passengers. But as netizens discovered, there is no D18 train: Wen Jiabao rides the nonexistent D18 trainby Ning MingOn the afternoon of the 20th, Wen Jiabao took the D18 EMU train back to Beijing. During the trip, he personally interacted with the other riders, asking them specific questions about their lives and work. Wen Jiabao was on an inspection tour of Hebei and returned from Tangshan to Beijing on the afternoon of the 20th by the so-called "D18 EMU train," and "during the trip, he personally interacted with the other riders, asking them specific questions about their lives and work." But the D18 EMU train is non-existent. If you search online timetables, you won't find this train. Or perhaps that train only existed on that one day and was added by the Ministry of Railways specifically for Wen. But then the train's passengers would probably have to have been workers in disguise. There's nothing wrong with Wen Jiabao, as the head of government, riding a special train arranged by the Ministry of Railways; didn't Mao ride a special train all over the place back in the day? The issue is that the officials named the train D18 and then reported it in the mass media. To an unknowing audience, Wen was close to the people as he rode an ordinary passenger train, and "personally interacted with the other riders." Through this simple word-game, a few more points were added to Wen's image as someone who loves the people as his own children. Tsk, amazing. Truly amazing. One detail here is that the train was given the route number D18. There are rules for naming train routes, and one general rule is that even numbers are given to trains going to Beijing, while those leaving Beijing are given odd numbers. D18 was named correctly, showing a bit of cleverness on the part of the propaganda department, or the painstaking effort of the Ministry of Railways. The Ministry evidently did its part in this instance of ass-kissing. Update:
Update 2
As of this morning, no correction has been issued regarding the original report. However, a number of blog and forum posts discussing the D18 train have mysteriously disappeared. Another netizen discovered an actual D18 train: for the New Year travel rush in 2008, an additional EMU train from Harbin to Beijing on January 2 and 3 was given the designation D18. Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
AllSeeingE on
Send a postcard to the future
Peter Andr on
Cats and dogs in the animal cruelty law
hanmeng on
Al Jazeera on potential dog meat ban
singingblu on
2012: a disaster movie not suitable for children
NINGT on
Goons and thugs
Len Chiu on
The body in the lake
Christie on
Pole dancing: for fitness, not about sex
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Diamond Hill by Feng Chi-shun: Feng's memoir Diamond Hill describes an era of gambling and gangsters, Suzie Wong and squatter villages, fires and food stalls, and the Kowloon Walled City and its white powder. "A time when people were poor, but life was rich," he says. The world that he grew up in no longer exists, but his book - the first ever on the Diamond Hill refugee settlement, in either Chinese or English - offers a candid picture of what life was like for most Hong Kong residents in the 1950s.
William A. Callahan's China: The Pessoptimist Nation: China: The Pessoptimist Nation shows how the heart of Chinese foreign policy is not a security dilemma, but an identity dilemma. Through a careful analysis of how Chinese people understand their new place in the world, the book charts how Chinese identity emerges through the interplay of positive and negative feelings in a dynamic that intertwines China's domestic and international politics.
The WTO ruling: a half victory at best: In August 2009, a World Trade Organization panel ruled against China's system of monopoly control over entertainment products. Was this the victory supporters hailed as the dawn of a new day for American and global entertainment companies in the China market?
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Street hawker cries of Beijing (2006.12): Yang Changhe demonstrates hawker's cries in a video shot by Muzimei. + New Weekly: Do Chinese kids know anything about traditonal Chinese culture? (2004.06): Q: Do you know what China's four great inventions are? Paper, printing, the compass and gunpowder 49.3% know all four, 37.3% get one or more wrong, 13.3% don't know at all (2004.06.12) + Some questions about SARFT's full-stop for Red Question Mark (2007.09): SARFT axes Red Question Mark (红问号). He Dong (何东) responds.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on Wen Jiabao takes a phantom train
this is the most boring post, Joel, that i have ever read in my life.
You shouldn't have brought it up in the 1st place. BTW, it's such a bland piece of journalism.
When journalism goes awry.
This is brilliant use of Twitter. Just can't resist the title! I thought we were at the beginning to create the mythology of Chinese Area 51 and all we get is a reporter typo?
Sometimes reporter's typos in China are very revealing, such as when they show the age of Olympic gymnasts.
Who else remembers the controversy when He Kexin's age was reported to be 14 by Xinhua and China Daily, as well as 生活报, 法制晚报, and 北京晚报?
China said "Oh, sorry, just a typo" and the IOC decided to let He keep the gold medals.
link
To bad your link does not work and all other english lang. chinese news source discuss his visit to Tangshan and Qinghuangdao but nothing about taking the train back to Beijing. They do report that he "personally interacted with the others, asking them specific questions about their lives and work."
If he did take the train it very well might have been D28 not D18.
The western media or White House communications office has never made any mistakes right?
Just another westerner who knows nothing about China that loves to cram western thinking and lifestyle down its throat.
I've updated the post with screen-captures of the sources I used prior to their deletion.
The D28 for D18 possibility is noted in the text translated above. Even if it's a press office mistake, why not simply correct the error rather than deleting the online posts that point it out?
why not simply correct the error rather than deleting the online posts that point it out?
---------------------
You are assuming that it is the same person or even the same department that can do both the deleting and correcting jobs. But there is no such person or department. They probably do not even cooperate on this trivial thing.
Wen is more like an actor than a premier, was he so childish as to get some truth from the passengers?
Show time!!!!!
Even if the train number is wrong, that doesn't mean that the reason it's wrong is in order to create a bogus quote in the newspaper about how Wen "personally interacted with the other riders, asking them specific questions about their lives and work." Of course, that type of ritualistic language is hard to stomach and it has a clear agenda. Perhaps all the questions about the train's real number are just excuses to bring up the hollowness of Wen's manufactured public image.
Looks like the popular Chinese blogger Roland Soong of EastSouthWestNorth does not agree that this is the most boring bland post cramming western thinking down China's throat.
Meanwhile I am hoping to meet Hu Jintao on the train to Henan and would like to ask his opinion of the government official in Zhengzhou (逯军)who photoshoplifted his hair and suit for the municipal government's website:
link
"The D28 for D18 possibility is noted in the text translated above. Even if it's a press office mistake, why not simply correct the error rather than deleting the online posts that point it out?"
--Because it's BORING to answer this and that and then more discussion and more analysis and a few more points and more and more...
--Besides, by correcting D18 to D28, to defend what? Oh, Mr. Wen is actually still a quite amiable person in the end, sigh...
"BORING" is not an excuse for poor journalism anway
Besides, Wen is really just a figurehead, his job is too look and act good, I think most mature Chinese know this inside. And he does a good job of it too.
D18 is a newly established service from BJ to a satellite city which happens to locate in Hebei Province...The service started this week, surely you wouldn’t see it on your old train schedules.