|
Intellectual Property
Google (China) vs. Beijing GugePosted by Joel Martinsen, July 13, 2007 6:10 PM
![]()
The Reuters report was based on a story from The Beijing News on Wednesday; today's papers provided additional information. According to TBN, Beijing Guge opened for business on 19 April, 2006, or one week after Google announced its new Chinese name the 12th. However, Tian claims that his company had applied to use the name Guge in March, prior to formal business operations. Google's spokesperson pushed its date back even earlier, claiming that applications were filed in January. And Google deflected Tian's complaints about directory assistance misinforming customers by pointing out that many companies elect not to register with 114. The general feeling online is that Beijing Guge chose its name out of opportunistic motives and filed its complaint in a bid to profit from the media attention. Links and Sources
There are currently 2 Comments for Google (China) vs. Beijing Guge.
Comments on Google (China) vs. Beijing GugeIt's very hard for Google to change his name Hi Joel, I elaborate on the Guge case: Guge Case: Business Name vs Trademark Dispute Or Practical Problem?. Cheers, |
Jobs in China
Danwei FM
Danwei Guides
+ Beijing
Corruption
|
- Home
- Archives
- Media Tools
-
Danwei TV
- Food safety in Beijing
- MLB in China
- Blogger Wang Xiaofeng
- Podcasters Antiwave
- Roland Soong on Eileen Chang
- Blogger Muzi Mei
- Beijing's African Billboards
- Media Mogul Hung Huang
- Big Buildings of Beijing
- Thomas Shao of Modern Media
- Big Buildings of Beijing
- Architect Ma Yansong
- Luoguxiang Hutong
- Dashalan with Mike Meyer
- African Football
- 8 Big Hutongs with Zhang Jinqi
- Swedish Ships and Porcelain
- Danwei FM
- China Jobs
- About

