|
Intellectual Property
WTO suit brews; China establishes patent centersPosted by Maya Alexandri, September 7, 2007 11:17 AM
On August 31, a World Trade Organization (WTO) committee met to consider the US request for an expert panel to arbitrate its suit against China over lax intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement.
A Xinhua/Reuters report reflects a range of responses. Professor Zhang Naigen, of Fudan University's IPR Research Center, seemed resigned to US suit going forward: "Since the US persists in wanting to establish the expert panel, the WTO will establish the expert panel." Wang Xinpei, spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce, expressed China's "regret" at the US request, while a World Intellectual Property Organization spokesperson reassured reporters that establishing an expert panel is just a WTO procedure and nothing to worry about. The most interesting response came from Mark Cohen, US Embassy IPR Attaché in Beijing. Recognizing that major problems still exist in many areas of IPR enforcement in China, Cohen advised that the most important step China should take is to protect its own patents. After all, Cohen cautioned, the US is suing China in the WTO on behalf of American companies, like Microsoft, that are multinational corporations; China is part of their market. "If China doesn't learn to protect the IPR of its own companies, then ultimately the biggest impact will be felt in China's own markets." From his lips to ear of the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO)? Five days later, Xinhua published a report that SIPO would be establishing "patent work stations" in 73 of China's state-owned enterprise (SOE) and institutional work units. The work stations will be served by a rotating staff of patent examiners, agents, attorneys and other IPR experts. The head of SIPO's business coordination department, Ma Weiye, explained that the main purposes of the work stations are to: (1) advance the development of IPR, (2) coordinate China's IPR strategy policy with its enactment, and (3) promote industry's IPR management capability. As a non-adversarial approach to IPR enforcement that transforms the Chinese from "bad guys" into stakeholders, these in-house patent resource centers seem promising. Of course, that promise could be dissipated in the implementation. In addition, these patent resource centers shouldn't be limited to SOEs. China would probably do better to support its private sector - the source of much of its innovation - rather than reinforcing the old-style overlap between government agencies and SOEs. Still, even if the patent resource centers go nowhere, they reflect thinking outside the box, which is a welcome development in response to US pressure about IPR. And given the extent to which the patent resource centers dovetail with IPR Attaché Cohen's advice, it's possible that they also reflect some cooperative brainstorming between the US and China on IPR issues. If that's the case, it would be a truly welcome development. Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
chengdude on
Blockages
Joel Marti on
Chengdu bus fire blamed on 62-year-old suicidal gambler
vivian on
Bound feet in China
Sajid on
China first police blog
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Foreign journalists in China, from the Opium Wars to Mao : Paul French, author of a book on Carl Crow has written a book about the lives and exploits of foreign journalists reporting from China from the 1820s to 1949.
Earnshaw Books' Tales of Old Peking: Tales from Old Peking is available from Earnshaw Books, and like its sister, Tales from Old Shanghai is a book of fragments of information about periods, events or places in Beijing's history, collaging together pictures and text about eunuchs, concubines, the Lama Temple, Opium Wars, art, emperors, and a miscellany of other interesting topics
Henry F. Pringle's "Bridge House Survivor": Pringle was imprisoned by Japanese forces from October 1942 to August 1945, and Bridge House Survivor, available from Earnshaw Books, is his harrowing account of torture under the Japanese.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ A short interview with Muzi Mei (2004.02): Danwei interviews Muzi Mei + CCTV vs. classic movies (2006.03): A rundown of several pastiches of Chinese movies appearing online as 大史记 - "The Year That Was". Some from CCTV, others not. With links to video. + Street hawker cries of Beijing (2006.12): Yang Changhe demonstrates hawker's cries in a video shot by Muzimei.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |





Comments on WTO suit brews; China establishes patent centers
China can't enforce IPR? What USA and the West never undersatnds is that China CAN enforce, they can especially enforce IPR of its own products and patents. I call this "selective IPR enforcement". For example, everyone knows that DVDs are rampantly pirated in China, however certain films that may be negative to the Chinese government, such as Tibet film starring Brad Pitt, are impossible to find on pirated DVD in China? How can the gevernment repress individual pirated films but not all pirated films? Becasue the government/military bases in Guangzhou is where most fake DVDs are produced. Another example, you can easily find fake Nike/Gucci/LV clothing in any Chinese city. Easy. But try and find a fake 2008 Beijing Olympics T-shirt. Very hard. Why? Cause sales of Olympic products go right into Beijing coffiers. Bottom line, they can enforce IPR, but why when they make so much money ripping it off.
If Russian can do it, so can China.
link