|
Magazines
China's nuclear black marketPosted by Banyue, October 15, 2007 10:00 AM
The cover story Phoenix Weekly for the first half of October concerns the dangerous nuclear black market in mainland China. Of course, this is not a market on which you can purchase nuclear weapons; rather, it deals in low-purity, home-made uranium ore products. With the increasing civil use of nuclear power, villagers who lived beside abandoned uranium mines discovered that yellow stones could be turned into money. So they blew up the seal to the mine and began private extraction, making underground deals and seeking buyers from abroad. These activities could push China, and the whole world, into disaster. Also on the cover: Jiang Renjie, former Deputy Major of Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, broke the record for corruption in China. In 2002, he accepted a bribe worth more than 80 million yuan, the largest single bribe amount ever taken on the Chinese mainland. Like Chen Liangyu, the Shanghai party boss who was toppled for corruption, his case was postponed until after the 17th Party Congress concludes. In September 2004, a man named Li Shengli fell off the Qiyi Road Police Station building in Zhoukou, Henan Province. He died at the scene; the station chief said that Li killed himself. On May 8, 2007, following an investigation, the court sentenced one officer to death, one to a suspended death sentence, and a third to life in prison. All three men appealed. At a second trial held on September 11, they clamored for all those who had provided evidence against them to appear in court, and would not quiet down until the judge postponed the trial. |
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
紫禁 on
Taxi vs Taxi
Chris/Kati on
Reserve a ticket on the 2012 ark through Taobao!
habtamu on
China developed by luck, not planning
Eric Mu on
Pretty interpreter makes the news
Spelunker on
Lesson learned, Zhou Yang thanks the country first
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Tales of Old Hong Kong: The new Tales of Old Hong Kong compiled by Derek Sandhaus is available at Earnshaw Books.
Diamond Hill by Feng Chi-shun: Feng's memoir Diamond Hill describes an era of gambling and gangsters, Suzie Wong and squatter villages, fires and food stalls, and the Kowloon Walled City and its white powder. "A time when people were poor, but life was rich," he says. The world that he grew up in no longer exists, but his book - the first ever on the Diamond Hill refugee settlement, in either Chinese or English - offers a candid picture of what life was like for most Hong Kong residents in the 1950s.
William A. Callahan's China: The Pessoptimist Nation: China: The Pessoptimist Nation shows how the heart of Chinese foreign policy is not a security dilemma, but an identity dilemma. Through a careful analysis of how Chinese people understand their new place in the world, the book charts how Chinese identity emerges through the interplay of positive and negative feelings in a dynamic that intertwines China's domestic and international politics.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Freedom of expression and government reform (2008.05): Zi Zhongyun (资中筠) talks of the need for institutional guarantees for free speech. + Trend-spotting in online fiction (2007.06): An interview with Daniel Dan Fei (丹飞), publisher of Notes on Graverobbing (盗墓笔记), Rear Palace (后宫), and Those Ming Dynasty Things (明朝那些事). + The Three Stooges in China (2004.09): "Can you do the laugh?" I ask him. "You know, that laugh?" He nods. He knows what I'm talking about. "Nyuk nyuk nyuk!" he suddenly erupts, in an imitation of Curly so compelling that I'm suddenly transported from Beijing to my family's living room floor in Eureka, Kansas, circa 1959...
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |





Comments on China's nuclear black market
does anyone read the Hong Kong edition of this magazine? Is it generally pretty much the same / exactly the same? or are there substantial differences?