|
Media and Advertising
China loosens TV regulations; Reuters calls it censorshipPosted by Jeremy Goldkorn, April 12, 2006 3:28 PM
![]() Checked with two sources? China unveiled new censorship rules for television dramas and news reports on Tuesday that tighten the Communist Party's squeeze on the country's increasingly commercial media... Danwei's Joel Martinsen clarified his take on it in an update: It's true that the preamble to the memo goes on at length about "strengthing political consciousness," but that sort of boilerplate may not mean anything significant. This "sensitive issues" have appeared in prior SARFT documents - the earlier system required certain topics to be pre-approved by relevant government departments, and SARFT's movie review system treats those topics as "special" as well. What seems to be going on here is that SARFT is turning its review responsibility over to provincial-level oversight bodies, and is reiterating its own in-house requirements for their benefit. Indeed. It seems to me that Reuters simply did not do any homework about previous TV regulations, and assumed that the new rules must be stricter than the old, adding a reference to the recent nonsense Western media story about GAPP refusing to allow any new foreign magazines in China. There is however one valid point in the Reuters article: SARFT also warned local television stations to stick to international news reports provided by the state-run China Central Television, and avoid foreign sources. |
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
passenger on
The case of the missing Obama front page
affordabe on
Blogspot unblocked, but Blogger is blocked
Adam J. Sc on
Snow in Beijing
Peter Kauf on
Bound feet in China
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Xujun Eberlein's Apologies Forthcoming: Hong Kong's Blacksmith Books has published a short story collection by Xujun Eberlein.
Princess Der Ling: Two Years in the Forbidden City: Two years in the Forbidden City is largely a reminiscence of the minutiae of life for one of history's most powerful women, by one of her court attendants, a Manchu noble's daughter by the name of Der Ling.
Carl Crow's The Long Road Back to China: In 1939 Carl Crow - an American journalist, advertising executive and author who had lived in Shanghai for 25 years until forced out by the Japanese - travelled up the Burma Road from Rangoon to Chongqing on assignment for Liberty magazine - 'the most interesting assignment I have ever been given'.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ The top Chinese books in 2007 (2008.02): China Reading Journal (中华读书报), Yazhou Zhoukan (亚洲周刊), and City Pictorial (城市画报) choose mainland China's top books for 2007. + Men behind the Nanny (2005.04): The Publicity Department (formerly known as the Propaganda Department) has held a "forum" in Beijing to promote what it calls "news editorial staff management regulations (in testing phase)". These regulations appear to be same the set of rules earlier reported on Danwei of which the stated intent is to clear up corrupt journalistic practices. + Asimov Published, Interviewed in Beijing (2005.03): Cover story from this week's Book Review section of The Beijing News announces the publication of a Chinese translation of Isaac Asimov's complete Foundation series. Yup, the Beijing News has scored a fictional interview with "I, Asimov". They've been taking similar liberties recently in their entertainment sections, captioning photographs of celebrities with made-up quotes.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on China loosens TV regulations; Reuters calls it censorship
A blogger complaining about the MSM's lack of attention to the blogger's niche field of interest. Ho hum. Are you denying that there is a media crackdown just because some regulations seem to be relaxing?
Jakeboy,
Your comment is facetious and self-defeating. It is inevitable that someone in the industry is better equipped to analyse the situation that some Reuters hack who has no knowledge about the subject matter at all.
The very patronising style of your comment suggests you are a journalist or at least from the mainstream media.
The reality is that many thinking people, globally, have lost faith in the mainstream because the mainstream hacks seem unable (or unwilling), any more, to report the facts or analyse change in laws, preferring to make a political point out of every single thing. Whatevere happens it must be "Commernist Chana bad!". It's a big yawn, quite frankly.
Ho hum indeed.
- Mark