|
Media regulation
How to get around the financial news regulationsPosted by Jeremy Goldkorn on Monday, May 4, 2009 at 4:49 PM
![]() David Wolf at the Silicon Hutong blog has a good review of the recently updated regulations for foreign financial news services operating in China: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters and Dow Jones. In summary: Aside from their news wires and other news businesses, these companies sell financial information to banks and financial institutions. Large clients of such services have terminals installed in their offices which receive real time feeds of stock and commodity prices and a massive selection of business news. The state-owned news agency Xinhua also provides such a services. For more than a decade, the foreign financial news providers have been fighting a struggle with Xinhua for the right to do their business in China. This has been rather difficult because Xinhua has also been the regulator of the industry, and it continually tried to make things difficult for its competitors. From David Wolf (emphasis added):
Wolf suggests a way that the financial news providers could respond:
Personally, I think there may be an elegant sidestep that is already in place, thanks to the way business entities are registered in China. Presumably, Thomson Reuters, Dow Jones and Bloomberg's news gathering operations are registered under a different business license than the one used for the sales and distribution of their financial information services. All they have to do is keep a legal wall between those two entities. If they make sure news gathering and the sale of financial services are kept on completely separate books, the financial services companies will not be breaking the new rules. Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
Henry on
The Eurasian Face
Caroline W on
Big in China
Michael on
Julia Lovell on translating Lu Xun's complete fiction: "His is an angry, searing vision of China"
Brandon K. on
Clueless academic takes on popular fantasy novels
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
From 2008
Books on China
The Eurasian Face : Blacksmith Books, a publishing house in Hong Kong, is behind The Eurasian Face, a collection of photographs by Kirsteen Zimmern. Below is an excerpt from the series:
Big in China: An adapted excerpt from Big In China: My Unlikely Adventures Raising A Family, Playing The Blues and Becoming A Star in China, just published this month. Author Alan Paul tells the story of arriving in Beijing as a trailing spouse, starting a blues band, raising kids and trying to make sense of China.
Pallavi Aiyar's Chinese Whiskers: Pallavi Aiyar's first novel, Chinese Whiskers, a modern fable set in contemporary Beijing, will be published in January 2011. Aiyar currently lives in Brussels where she writes about Europe for the Business Standard. Below she gives permissions for an excerpt.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Korean history doesn't fly on Chinese TV screens (2007.09): SARFT puts the kibbosh on Korean historical dramas. + Religion and government in an uneasy mix (2008.03): Phoenix Weekly (凤凰周刊) article from October, 2007, on government influence on religious practice in Tibet. + David Moser on Mao impersonators (2004.10): I first became aware of this phenomenon in 1992 when I turned on a Beijing TV variety show and was jolted by the sight of "Mao Zedong" and "Zhou Enlai" playing a game of ping pong. They both gave short, rousing speeches, and then were reverently interviewed by the emcee, who thanked them profusely for taking time off from their governmental duties to appear on the show.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on How to get around the financial news regulations
Jeremy, it's funny you mention the "Chinese wall" solution. There are three potential issues with that. First, the Chinese government has to believe in the wall in as something more than just a foreign, legalistic artifice. Second, that the legal wall between the entities will function. Third, each FFIPs will have to demonstrate that the wall works by carrying no China news or information gathered by their news gathering organization on information services sold by that side of the business in China.
Anything less, and they are still de facto domestic news services.
'Settlement' results in SCIO as regulator? I assume the WTO et al expect the new regulator to be impartial, objective, fair? Yet this is the same SCIO that ordered one of its subordinate offices to fabricate evidence in order to win a certain media trademark case a few years back? And the same SCIO who told other official agencies (e.g. AIC) to 'bring themselves in line' when the (foreign) legal owner of the trademark raised a stink about the case in the same (foreign) press, the financial part of which the SCIO will now be regulating...
When oh when will the United States, the European Union, Canada and the WTO understand what China is about?