|
Media regulation
New rules imposed on Internet video contentPosted by Joel Martinsen, April 1, 2009 12:15 PM
![]() Watch out for netizen journalists The State Administration of Radio, Film, and TV is going after Internet videos. In a notice issued on March 30, the Administration emphasized its concern over vulgarity and listed various types of content that online video hosts should filter from their sites. Part (1) of the notice is the standard list of illegal content found in regulations on film, books, and other cultural material: no splittism, cults, or disruptions of social order. Parts (2) and (3) are tailored for the type of content that currently appears, to varying degrees, on Chinese video hosts. Here's a translation: (2) Internet audio-visual program service providers must edit or delete programs that contain any of the following:
(3) Internet audio-visual program service providers must improve their program content administration systems and emergency response mechanisms by hiring well-qualified service personnel to review and filter content, with particular attention paid to online music videos, variety shows, film shorts, and animation, as well as "self-shot" (自拍), "hot dancing" (热舞), "pretty girls" (美女), "funny" (搞笑), "original content" (原创), and "netizen reporters" (拍客), to insure that program content does not violate the rules mentioned in parts (1) and (2) of this notice. They must also promptly handle netizen complaints and related matters. SARFT's obviously been paying close attention to the wealth of programming on China's video hosts. However, it's what follows in part (4) of the Notice that has caught the attention of the mainstream media. The Administration has reiterated its control of online programming by applying its current television and film approval process to series shown online. Given the lead time involved in obtaining permission, this provision has the potential to shake up the industry. From The Beijing News:
Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
AllSeeingE on
Send a postcard to the future
Peter Andr on
Cats and dogs in the animal cruelty law
hanmeng on
Al Jazeera on potential dog meat ban
singingblu on
2012: a disaster movie not suitable for children
NINGT on
Goons and thugs
Len Chiu on
The body in the lake
Christie on
Pole dancing: for fitness, not about sex
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
![]() Recommended blogs and new media
Books on China
Diamond Hill by Feng Chi-shun: Feng's memoir Diamond Hill describes an era of gambling and gangsters, Suzie Wong and squatter villages, fires and food stalls, and the Kowloon Walled City and its white powder. "A time when people were poor, but life was rich," he says. The world that he grew up in no longer exists, but his book - the first ever on the Diamond Hill refugee settlement, in either Chinese or English - offers a candid picture of what life was like for most Hong Kong residents in the 1950s.
William A. Callahan's China: The Pessoptimist Nation: China: The Pessoptimist Nation shows how the heart of Chinese foreign policy is not a security dilemma, but an identity dilemma. Through a careful analysis of how Chinese people understand their new place in the world, the book charts how Chinese identity emerges through the interplay of positive and negative feelings in a dynamic that intertwines China's domestic and international politics.
The WTO ruling: a half victory at best: In August 2009, a World Trade Organization panel ruled against China's system of monopoly control over entertainment products. Was this the victory supporters hailed as the dawn of a new day for American and global entertainment companies in the China market?
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Street hawker cries of Beijing (2006.12): Yang Changhe demonstrates hawker's cries in a video shot by Muzimei. + New Weekly: Do Chinese kids know anything about traditonal Chinese culture? (2004.06): Q: Do you know what China's four great inventions are? Paper, printing, the compass and gunpowder 49.3% know all four, 37.3% get one or more wrong, 13.3% don't know at all (2004.06.12) + Some questions about SARFT's full-stop for Red Question Mark (2007.09): SARFT axes Red Question Mark (红问号). He Dong (何东) responds.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on New rules imposed on Internet video content
Well, that rules out Journey to the West, Three Kingdoms, Shakespeare, the Bible and 99% of all world literature.
Hmm... I wonder what Danwei's policy is on confidentiality. You know with my comments on NWO and other crazy *** ... would definitely constitute "distrotions of other nations." I'm really paranoid about the Chinese government having their ways with me, the next time when I'm in China.
Blah. They probably got me tracked already... prolly via NSA. Hmm... nothing to really worry about then, if I go bye bye, I go bye bye.
Move along, nothing to see here.
P.S -- Human civilization sucks big donkey balls.
Wow, seems we are back into Qing Dynasty
Also all the chinese soap operas, all the movies from Hong Kong, China and the rest of the World, all the fables for kids ...
What a pity they couldn't find another line item, so that Catch 21 would be Catch 22, since that's what it is!
I've decided to head back to America in a few months for good. It's news like this that prevent me from having second thoughts....
I am so sorry my students will have to grow up and "learn" in this dystopia.
They've been trying to impose a lot of feudal rules, 11 out of 10 failed, and how long do they think they can keep this up? 2 years? 5?? won't be long before the old fars in the propaganda agency die off and the new generation takes over! Yahoo!!!!
...I mean Google.
And as the clock is turned backward even more time runs out for the Party.
Notice there's nothing there about outrageous IP violations...
Can anyone name any (mainstream, non-B, non-adult)movie that manages to violate all 21?
I can think of only "Clockwork Orange"
I like rule (1)... Anything could be construe as violation of rule 1. But since these rules will be applied selectively, it is up to the powers that be to rule anything they don't like to be in violation. Great way to write laws that is flexible and serve the revolution.
I'm still waiting for the day where it turns out that publishing houses have started bribing state censorship bodies to declare various publications illegal, because it encourages sales.
>>publishing houses have started bribing state censorship bodies to declare various publications illegal, because it encourages sales
Already happened, Inst. Ask anyone in the industry.
April Fool's was yesterday. Really? Got documentation? Would be an awesome angle for journalists to pick up on.
"Promotion of palm-reading, fortune-telling, fengshui, divination, exorcism, and other feudal superstitious activity;"
顶!我支持!
// 小石