Media regulation

SARFT's guide to talent show etiquette

Wang Han and Li Xiang, hosts of last years' Super Girls competition

SARFT issued a notice to television and broadcast stations yesterday informing them of new rules intended to stem the tide of vulgar talent shows that have been so detrimental to national morality in recent months.

The notice stipulates what sort of talent shows can be broadcast when, and by what sort of broadcaster. It prescribes a comprehensive pre-screening process for program content, length, judges, hosts, and special guests. In response to loud complaints about the unfairness of SMS vote tallying, it bans all off-site voting - whether by SMS, Internet, or telephone. Additionally, programs are prohibited from using dirty tricks to mislead voters in the studio audience.

The most recent debacle was broadcast live on Chongqing TV, so the new regulations allow only the last episode of the final stage of any competition to be a live broadcast. Even then it must be delayed at least one minute, and the program must "guarantee that no problems will occur."

SARFT also expands on previous guides to appropriate behavior. Here's the Administration's latest rubric on participant etiquette:

The design of participatory competitions must place constraints on the content. Speeches by the hosts, critiques by the judges, personal expressions by the contestants, emotional displays by family and friends, and interstitial scenes must be significantly reduced; they may not make up more than 20% of the total program time. The competition content itself must make up at least 80% of the total program time. In singing competitions (apart from competitions devoted to foreign songs), domestic songs must account for at least 75% of each episode's songs.

Competitors' stage presence, language, hairstyle, and attire must be in line with mainstream aesthetics. Contestants must be strictly screened; morally and behaviorally deficient contestants may not be selected. The contestants' fortitude, maturity, independence, confidence, health, and ambition must be shown off. Programs are not to manufacture gimmickry, sensationalism, or exaggerated grief, and they may not openly broadcast or allude to negative information and gossip about contestants. Contestants must be above 18 years of age....

Program hosts must be be aware of the nature of their position. They must strengthen their sense of social responsibility, and they must be adept in handling problems that may break out during the course of the program. Hosts may not express personal emotions or likes and dislikes during the program; they may not call attention to personal expression. Their words must be concise. They may not use intimate forms of address like "sister" or "brother" when talking to contestants, special guests, judges, or any other performers. Hosts may not mock, flatter, or flirt with each other.

Judges and special guests must be authoritative and professional, and must be acknowledged within their field. Judges and guests must have a good social conscience and personal morality, and they must be cultivated and self-restrained. Judges and special guests must make their judgments fair, professional, appropriate, and concise. They are there to increase the audience's level of artistic appreciation and are not permitted to discuss matters unrelated to the competition itself. They may not use their position as judge or special guest to promote themselves. Their attire and hairstyle shall be in good taste.

SARFT concludes with an appeal to television stations and administrative organs to carry out the spirit of the notice - presumably to cover whatever details they overlooked in their description of proper behavior.

This parody from the 2005 season of Super Girls is looking more prescient every day:

Zhou Tao: The land is filled with reform's spring breeze, and super girls must test their wills. Viewers, the Super Girls competing in today's competition have been selected by local TV stations across the country. Passing through stringent political investigations, they are red-rooted and upright, they are actively moving forward, they work hard to closely organize, they are both red and professional, and they are completely trustworthy.

Links and Sources
There are currently 4 Comments for SARFT's guide to talent show etiquette.

Comments on SARFT's guide to talent show etiquette

After reading the first half of the post I was about to post "sounds like every gameshow on CCTV." Great minds think alike ;)

As pathetic as it is that they're trying to to regulate this stuff, I don't necessarily disagree with some of what they want to change. Less time spent on utterly infantile games, inane host banter, and emotional reactions? I wouldn't complain if these were artistic choices rather than edicts. Not that any changes could save these shows from being utter crap.

Are there enough moral, knowledgeable, well dressed and tonsured, talented, emotionally restrained, non flirtatious people in all of China to fill all the roles of contestants, special guests, judges and hosts? And if there were, why would they participate in one of these shows? Getting a deadpan contestant's family is also going to be a big problem I think.
It's too strict. If you were moral but had a Hong Kong haircut, I think you could still make a worthwhile contribution to such a show.

The first night I spent in Beijing in 2000, I turned on the TV and watched a singing competition.

Contestants sang fairly demanding pieces of music, and then had to sight read an aria or some other less well-known piece of European choral music. They were also asked to sing intervals and answer a few music theory and music history questions. It was like an entrance exam for a conservatory.

The judges were professors from music academies (a number of them were PLA, I believe), and they gave polite but stern criticism of the contestants. Even though it was all done in a very civilized manner - no flirting, mocking, or other gimmickry - some of the contestants seemed on the verge of tears when they were finished.

China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
From 2008
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Culture and corporate propaganda in Soho Xiaobao (2007.11): Mid-2007 issues of Soho Xiaobao (SOHO小报), illustrating the complicated identity of in-house magazines run by real estate companies.
+ Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship (2010.03): Internet executives complain about excessive Net censorship at an officially sanctioned meeting in Shenzhen.
+ Crowd-sourced cheating on the 2010 gaokao (2010.06): A student in Sichuan seeks help with the ancient Chinese section of this year's college entrance exam -- while the test is going on!
Danwei Archives