|
History
Cultural heritage and backyard iron smeltingPosted by Joel Martinsen on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM
A group of more than 150 steel furnaces stretching two kilometers across a hillside was recently discovered in Gansu Province. The furnaces date from the Great Leap Forward, when the entire country was mobilized to turn scrap iron into steel using small-scale furnaces, with the aim of doubling the national output. The project was a total disaster and the furnaces were abandoned two years later. Some of the furnaces are in remarkably good condition, writes Cao Yong in the Lanzhou Morning Post:
The Lanzhou Morning Post report, which was reprinted in newspapers around the country alongside the photo reproduced above, does not provide any larger context for the "backyard" (土法) furnaces or the Great Leap Forward's steel production drive. In a The Beijing News op-ed, Wu Zuolai, a cultural critic and current president of the journal Theory and Criticism of Art and Literature (文艺理论与批评), delved into the "Great Leap Forward mentality" and argued for the preservation of the furnaces as a way to carry on the memory of that time: "Ruins of Great Leap Forward smelters" should be preservedby Wu Zuolai / TBNA cultural heritage survey in Sunan County discovered a large area of backyard iron furnaces from the Great Leap Forward. One hundred fifty nine of them altogether, around fifty of which are mostly intact. The smelters stand eight meters high at their tallest and up to fourteen meters around, and they are possibly the largest, most numerous, and best-preserved group of Great Leap Forward smelters in the country. The county government has named the ruins a protected cultural heritage site. (From the Yangcheng Evening News, July 20) Half a century has passed in the blink of an eye, and the backyard smelters of the Great Leap Forward have at last become ruins, lying there on the ground for people to reflect upon. History is recorded in words, but the preservation of a group of relatively intact iron furnaces is extremely valuable. The men and women who labored to refine iron in that era have grown old, and it is hard to imagine what feelings and memories will be brought to mind when they see the furnaces that they constructed and the “products” they produced. On August 17, 1958, a resolution calling on the Whole Party and People to Strive to Produce 10.7 Million Tons of Steel sparked a great mass movement to produce steel. If we think along those lines, we could say that the steel production campaign was a result of China’s positive enthusiasm at the time as well as anxiety over development on the part of a backward country, and a forceful call could irresistibly become a duty and a mission for which the entire populace would strive and struggle. People who experienced that time recall that whole forests were cut down to make charcoal to burn, bringing immense disaster to the environment. And because some areas were unable to produce acceptable steel, the people had to break apart their cooking pots and melt them down in the furnaces, and as a result, unusable lumps of iron were all that was produced. One unforeseen consequence was that real cultural heritage was plundered during the steel production campaign. The two-storey tower at the famous Hangu Pass* was torn down, and inscriptions accumulated over the course of two thousand years were destroyed. Wuwei County,* Gansu, was an important northwestern garrison in the Tang Dynasty, and its city wall, built of large bricks, towered for a thousand years. But those thousand-year-old bricks became part of the furnaces. There are natural laws that govern nature: you can't pull on shoots to help them grow. Similarly, social and economic development has its own set of laws: all-out effort won't bring accelerated economic growth overnight. In those days, iron was the "supreme commander," iron was everything. That was the extreme mentality of the Great Leap Forward. Society no longer meant unified economic development. It was forced to make immense, unconditional sacrifices for the cause of increasing a particular type of output, and spiritual victories were won by realizing a particular target. As a result, the views of those who opposed rash advances were criticized, and they were sidelined as obstacles to rapid development. Radical speech, thinking, and officials became the mainstream and its guiding forces. The past has become a memory and a historical lesson. But has the mentality of the Great Leap Forward been entirely eradicated? Faced with this massive cluster of iron smelters, we have much to reflect upon. Public, scientific, and democratic decision making must not be merely empty words but must be put into practice in every project. Now that backyard iron furnaces have become a new cultural heritage site, I propose that there be a corresponding set of initiatives, such as the establishment of a small museum in the northwest in memory of the Great Leap Forward, which will collect contemporary documents. Particularly important are the memories of the people who endured it, and it would be even more meaningful if they could be recorded on film. If cultural relics protection is sought, and if a park is to be built around the ruins, we also hope that it will the methods of the Great Leap Forward will not be employed. As few man-made structures as possible should be erected in the area around the furnaces so that their original appearance can be retained. This is the best way to respect and preserve historical relics. Notes
Links and Sources
|
Partner Links
Jobs in China
Recent Comments
Henry on
The Eurasian Face
Caroline W on
Big in China
Michael on
Julia Lovell on translating Lu Xun's complete fiction: "His is an angry, searing vision of China"
Brandon K. on
Clueless academic takes on popular fantasy novels
China Media Timeline
Major media events over the last three decades
Danwei Model Workers
The latest recommended blogs and new media
From 2008
Books on China
The Eurasian Face : Blacksmith Books, a publishing house in Hong Kong, is behind The Eurasian Face, a collection of photographs by Kirsteen Zimmern. Below is an excerpt from the series:
Big in China: An adapted excerpt from Big In China: My Unlikely Adventures Raising A Family, Playing The Blues and Becoming A Star in China, just published this month. Author Alan Paul tells the story of arriving in Beijing as a trailing spouse, starting a blues band, raising kids and trying to make sense of China.
Pallavi Aiyar's Chinese Whiskers: Pallavi Aiyar's first novel, Chinese Whiskers, a modern fable set in contemporary Beijing, will be published in January 2011. Aiyar currently lives in Brussels where she writes about Europe for the Business Standard. Below she gives permissions for an excerpt.
Front Page of the Day
A different newspaper every weekday
From the Vault
Classic Danwei posts
+ Korean history doesn't fly on Chinese TV screens (2007.09): SARFT puts the kibbosh on Korean historical dramas. + Religion and government in an uneasy mix (2008.03): Phoenix Weekly (凤凰周刊) article from October, 2007, on government influence on religious practice in Tibet. + David Moser on Mao impersonators (2004.10): I first became aware of this phenomenon in 1992 when I turned on a Beijing TV variety show and was jolted by the sight of "Mao Zedong" and "Zhou Enlai" playing a game of ping pong. They both gave short, rousing speeches, and then were reverently interviewed by the emcee, who thanked them profusely for taking time off from their governmental duties to appear on the show.
Danwei Archives
Danwei Feeds
Via Feedsky
or Feedburner |






Comments on Cultural heritage and backyard iron smelting
Any idea where this Heiyaodong Village is located on the map? I think I've pinned down where Baiyin Mongolian Township is (36° 32' 42" N, 104° 8' 16" E).
Here it is on Google maps. The satellite image doesn't have great resolution, unfortunately.